Detection of brain oedema using magnetic induction tomography: a feasibility study of the likely sensitivity and detectability.

The detection and continuous monitoring of brain oedema is of particular interest in clinical applications because existing methods (invasive measurement of the intracranial pressure) may cause considerable distress for the patients. A new non-invasive method for continuous monitoring of an oedema promises the use of multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography (MIT). MIT is an imaging method for reconstructing the changes of the conductivity deltakappa in a target object. The sensitivity of a single MIT-channel to a spherical oedematous region was analysed with a realistic model of the human brain. The model considers the cerebrospinal fluid around the brain, the grey matter, the white matter, the ventricle system and an oedema (spherical perturbation). Sensitivity maps were generated for different sizes and positions of the oedema when using a coaxial coil system. The maps show minimum sensitivity along the coil axis, and increasing values when moving the perturbation towards the brain surface. Parallel to the coil axis, however, the sensitivity does not vary significantly. When assuming a standard deviation of 10(-7) for the relative voltage change due to the system's noise, a centrally placed oedema with a conductivity contrast of 2 with respect to the background and a radius of 20 mm can be detected at 100 kHz. At higher frequencies the sensitivity increases considerably, thus suggesting the capability of multi-frequency MIT to detect cerebral oedema.

[1]  Kimble R Dunster,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of cerebral bioimpedance for detection of cerebral edema in the neonatal piglet , 2002, Brain Research.

[2]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  Sensitivity maps for low-contrast perturbations within conducting background in magnetic induction tomography. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[3]  A Korjenevsky,et al.  Magnetic induction tomography: experimental realization. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[4]  Vladimir A. Cherepenin,et al.  Progress in Realization of Magnetic Induction Tomography , 1999 .

[5]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  Numerical solution of the general 3D eddy current problem for magnetic induction tomography (spectroscopy). , 2003, Physiological measurement.

[6]  Hermann Scharfetter,et al.  Biological tissue characterization by magnetic induction spectroscopy (MIS): requirements and limitations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Anthony Peyton,et al.  Electromagnetic Imaging Using Mutual Inductance Tomography: Potential for process applications , 1995 .

[8]  O. Bíró Edge element formulations of eddy current problems , 1999 .

[9]  H Griffiths,et al.  Magnetic Induction Tomography: A Measuring System for Biological Tissues , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J Netz,et al.  Contactless impedance measurement by magnetic induction--a possible method for investigation of brain impedance. , 1993, Physiological measurement.

[12]  H. Griffiths Magnetic induction tomography , 2001 .