Adhesion Forces and Coaggregation between Vaginal Staphylococci and Lactobacilli

Urogenital infections are the most common ailments afflicting women. They are treated with dated antimicrobials whose efficacy is diminishing. The process of infection involves pathogen adhesion and displacement of indigenous Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus jensenii. An alternative therapeutic approach to antimicrobial therapy is to reestablish lactobacilli in this microbiome through probiotic administration. We hypothesized that lactobacilli displaying strong adhesion forces with pathogens would facilitate coaggregation between the two strains, ultimately explaining the elimination of pathogens seen in vivo. Using atomic force microscopy, we found that adhesion forces between lactobacilli and three virulent toxic shock syndrome toxin 1-producing Staphylococcus aureus strains, were significantly stronger (2.2–6.4 nN) than between staphylococcal pairs (2.2–3.4 nN), especially for the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (4.0–6.4 nN) after 120 s of bond-strengthening. Moreover, stronger adhesion forces resulted in significantly larger coaggregates. Adhesion between the bacteria occurred instantly upon contact and matured within one to two minutes, demonstrating the potential for rapid anti-pathogen effects using a probiotic. Coaggregation is one of the recognized mechanisms through which lactobacilli can exert their probiotic effects to create a hostile micro-environment around a pathogen. With antimicrobial options fading, it therewith becomes increasingly important to identify lactobacilli that bind strongly with pathogens.

[1]  G. Reid,et al.  Probiotic strategies for the treatment and prevention of bacterial vaginosis , 2010, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[2]  N. High,et al.  Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms. , 2003, Trends in microbiology.

[3]  James Versalovic,et al.  Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri biofilms produce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors , 2009, BMC Microbiology.

[4]  Gregory B. Gloor,et al.  Deep Sequencing of the Vaginal Microbiota of Women with HIV , 2010, PloS one.

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[6]  Daniel J Müller,et al.  Force probing surfaces of living cells to molecular resolution. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[7]  J. Marrazzo,et al.  Temporal Variability of Human Vaginal Bacteria and Relationship with Bacterial Vaginosis , 2010, PloS one.

[8]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Interference in initial adhesion of uropathogenic bacteria and yeasts to silicone rubber by a Lactobacillus acidophilus biosurfactant. , 1999, Journal of medical microbiology.

[9]  Chris J. Wright,et al.  Atomic Force Microscopy Study of the Adhesion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[10]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Interactive Forces between Co-aggregating and Non-co-aggregating Oral Bacterial Pairs , 2006, Journal of dental research.

[11]  Michael Krieg,et al.  New frontiers in atomic force microscopy: analyzing interactions from single-molecules to cells. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[12]  Jean M. Macklaim,et al.  At the crossroads of vaginal health and disease, the genome sequence of Lactobacillus iners AB-1 , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  N. Akhtar,et al.  Aerobic vaginal pathogens and their sensitivity pattern. , 2008, Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC.

[14]  P. Loubière,et al.  Measuring kinetic dissociation/association constants between Lactococcus lactis bacteria and mucins using living cell probes. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[15]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Weibull analyses of bacterial interaction forces measured using AFM. , 2010, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[16]  R. Knight,et al.  Microbiota restoration: natural and supplemented recovery of human microbial communities , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  H. Harmsen,et al.  Atomic force microscopy study on specificity and non-specificity of interaction forces between Enterococcus faecalis cells with and without aggregation substance. , 2005, Microbiology.

[18]  G. Reid,et al.  Coaggregation of urogenital bacteria in vitro and in vivo , 2005, Current Microbiology.

[19]  G. Reid,et al.  Effect of Lactobacillus challenge on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms. , 2007, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[20]  A. Touhami,et al.  Nanoscale Characterization and Determination of Adhesion Forces of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pili by Using Atomic Force Microscopy , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  G. O’Toole,et al.  Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. , 2001, Trends in microbiology.

[22]  P. Gajer,et al.  Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  P. Kolenbrander,et al.  Specificity of coaggregation reactions between human oral streptococci and strains of Actinomyces viscosus or Actinomyces naeslundii , 1979, Infection and immunity.

[24]  H. Lochs,et al.  Adherent Biofilms in Bacterial Vaginosis , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  T. Camesano,et al.  Role of cranberry juice on molecular-scale surface characteristics and adhesion behavior of Escherichia coli. , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  G. Reid,et al.  Disruption of urogenital biofilms by lactobacilli. , 2011, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[27]  Daniel J. Muller,et al.  Single-cell force spectroscopy , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.