Calibration of an amorphous-silicon flat panel portal imager for exit-beam dosimetry.

Amorphous-silicon flat panel detectors are currently used to acquire digital portal images with excellent image quality for patient alignment before external beam radiation therapy. As a first step towards interpreting portal images acquired during treatment in terms of the actual dose delivered to the patient, a calibration method is developed to convert flat panel portal images to the equivalent water dose deposited in the detector plane and at a depth of 1.5 cm. The method is based on empirical convolution models of dose deposition in the flat panel detector and in water. A series of calibration experiments comparing the response of the flat panel imager and ion chamber measurements of dose in water determines the model parameters. Kernels derived from field size measurements account for the differences in the production and detection of scattered radiation in the two systems. The dissimilar response as a function of beam energy spectrum is characterized from measurements performed at various off-axis positions and for increasing attenuator thickness in the beam. The flat panel pixel inhomogeneity is corrected by comparing a large open field image with profiles measured in water. To verify the accuracy of the calibration method, calibrated flat panel profiles were compared with measured dose profiles for fields delivered through solid water slabs, a solid water phantom containing an air cavity, and an anthropomorphic head phantom. Open rectangular fields of various sizes and locations as well as a multileaf collimator-shaped field were delivered. For all but the smallest field centered about the central axis, the calibrated flat panel profiles matched the measured dose profiles with little or no systematic deviation and approximately 3% (two standard deviations) accuracy for the in-field region. The calibrated flat panel profiles for fields located off the central axis showed a small -1.7% systematic deviation from the measured profiles for the in-field region. Out of the field, the differences between the calibrated flat panel and measured profiles continued to be small, approximately 0%-2% of the mean in-field dose. Further refinement of the calibration model should increase the accuracy of the procedure. This calibration method for flat panel portal imagers may be used as part of a validation scheme to verify the dose delivered to the patient during treatment.

[1]  M van Herk,et al.  New method to obtain the midplane dose using portal in vivo dosimetry. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  B G Fallone,et al.  Three-dimensional IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID. , 2005, Medical physics.

[3]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Portal dose measurement in radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J Pouliot,et al.  Dose-guided radiation therapy with megavoltage cone-beam CT. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  M van Herk,et al.  Two-dimensional exit dosimetry using a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device and a convolution model. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  M van Herk,et al.  Transmission dosimetry with a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  A G Visser,et al.  Accurate portal dose measurement with a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for open and wedged beams and dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Dosimetric verification of x-ray fields with steep dose gradients using an electronic portal imaging device. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  R Tielenburg,et al.  The long-term stability of amorphous silicon flat panel imaging devices for dosimetry purposes. , 2004, Medical physics.

[10]  P M Evans,et al.  The application of transit dosimetry to precision radiotherapy. , 1996, Medical physics.

[11]  D Huyskens,et al.  Pre-treatment dosimetric verification by means of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device during dynamic delivery of intensity modulated treatment fields. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Peter B Greer,et al.  Dosimetric properties of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for verification of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  A G Visser,et al.  Transit dosimetry with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for 115 prostate cancer patients. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  T. Frenzel,et al.  Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements. , 2004, Medical physics.

[15]  Martin J Butson,et al.  Multilayer Gafchromic film detectors for breast skin dose determination in vivo. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Ben J.M. Heijmen,et al.  Dosimetric verification of intensity modulated beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation using an electronic portal imaging device. , 1999 .

[17]  B. McCurdy,et al.  Dosimetric investigation and portal dose image prediction using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device. , 2001, Medical physics.

[18]  C C Ling,et al.  An iterative EPID calibration procedure for dosimetric verification that considers the EPID scattering factor. , 2001, Medical physics.

[19]  M Partridge,et al.  IMRT verification by three-dimensional dose reconstruction from portal beam measurements. , 2002, Medical physics.

[20]  C C Ling,et al.  Relative profile and dose verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Richard Lee,et al.  An investigation of a new amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for transit dosimetry. , 2002, Medical physics.

[22]  M C Kirby,et al.  The use of an electronic portal imaging device for exit dosimetry and quality control measurements. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Y. Zhu,et al.  Portal dosimetry using a liquid ion chamber matrix: dose response studies. , 1995, Medical physics.

[24]  B G Fallone,et al.  Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID. , 2003, Medical physics.

[25]  K. Lam,et al.  Relative dosimetry using active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) technology. , 1999, Medical physics.

[26]  B R Paliwal,et al.  Modeling dose distributions from portal dose images using the convolution/superposition method. , 1996, Medical physics.

[27]  J J Sonke,et al.  Dose-response and ghosting effects of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device. , 2003, Medical physics.

[28]  J. Moran,et al.  An Active Matrix Flat Panel Dosimeter (AMFPD) for in-phantom dosimetric measurements. , 2005, Medical physics.

[29]  M van Herk,et al.  Three-dimensional dose reconstruction of breast cancer treatment using portal imaging. , 2003, Medical physics.

[30]  Tom Depuydt,et al.  The use of an aSi-based EPID for routine absolute dosimetric pre-treatment verification of dynamic IMRT fields. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  J Yorkston,et al.  Initial performance evaluation of an indirect-detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) prototype for megavoltage imaging. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  R. Sloboda,et al.  Comprehensive Monte Carlo calculation of the point spread function for a commercial a-Si EPID. , 2005, Medical physics.

[33]  M B Aufderheide,et al.  Blurring artifacts in megavoltage radiography with a flat-panel imaging system: comparison of Monte Carlo simulations with measurements. , 2002, Medical physics.