Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics relationship of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium during Electroconvulsive Therapy

Background Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are used during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to mitigate the induced severe muscle contractures. The objective of this study was to analyze the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) relationship of succinylcholine and rocuronium during ECT. Methods The available data on the first twitch height (T1) of 31 patients who underwent ECT as well as the corresponding intravenously applied doses of succinylcholine and rocuronium were used for the analyses in the study. The T1% (percentage change from the response to the supramaximal stimulus) derived from continuously applied TOF Watch recording to assess the minimal effective doses of succinylcholine and rocuronium during ECT. NONMEM software was used to construct, evaluate and validate the PKPD models. The PKPD of the two NMBAs was described using a two-compartment PK model and effect compartment model. The PK-PD parameter estimates required for the simulation of blood concentration were abstracted from previously reported studies in the literature. Results The PD model parameter estimates for succinlcholine and rocuronium during ECT were ke0= 0.04 min−1 (SEE=0.004) and ke0= 0.17 min-1 (SEE=0.19), respectively. The Ce50 estimations for these two NMBAs were amounted to 0.7 μg/ml (SEE=0.06) and 1.6 (SEE=0.1), respectively. The ke0 for neostigmine was not estimable, however the Ce50 was measured to be 0.412 (SEE=0.06). Conclusion The estimated PK-PD parameters for succinylcholine and rocuronium during ECT are almost comparable to previous PK-PD estimates for these two NMBA. The observed higher Ce50 for rocuronium might explain faster recovery after ECT from NMB and warrants further investigation. PK-PD of succinylcholine and rocuromium during ECT Chapter 4

[1]  A. Nozari,et al.  Neuromuscular blocking agents for electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review , 2012, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  M. Stek,et al.  Beat-to-Beat Hemodynamic Monitoring During Electroconvulsive Therapy , 2011, The journal of ECT.

[3]  J. Hunter,et al.  Reversal of neuromuscular block. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  M. Eikermann,et al.  Antagonism of non‐depolarising neuromuscular block: current practice , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[5]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  J. Hunter,et al.  The doughnut and the hole: a new pharmacological concept for anaesthetists. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  Lewis B. Sheiner,et al.  Building population pharmacokineticpharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects , 1992, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[8]  C. Meistelman,et al.  A kinetic-dynamic model to explain the relationship between high potency and slow onset time for neuromuscular blocking drugs , 1991, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[9]  F. Varin,et al.  Physicochemical properties of neuromuscular blocking agents and their impact on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship. , 2004, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  V. Saldien,et al.  Target controlled infusion of rocuronium: analysis of effect data to select a pharmacokinetic model. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  François Donati,et al.  Concentration–Effect Relation of Succinylcholine Chloride during Propofol Anesthesia , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[12]  J. Hunter,et al.  The new neuromuscular blocking agents: do they offer any advantages? , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  E. Olofsen,et al.  Recirculatory Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rocuronium in Patients: The Influence of Cardiac Output , 2001, Anesthesiology.

[14]  A. Kopman,et al.  Molar potency is predictive of the speed of onset of neuromuscular block for agents of intermediate, short, and ultrashort duration. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[15]  S. Feldman NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK , 1954, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[16]  J H Proost,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rocuronium at the vocal cords and the adductor pollicis in humans , 1995, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[17]  Ronald D. Miller,et al.  Onset and Duration of Rocuronium and Succinylcholine at the Adductor Pollicis and Laryngeal Adductor Muscles in Anesthetized Humans , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[18]  J. Wierda,et al.  The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of Org 9426, a new non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent, in patients anaesthetized with nitrous oxide, halothane and fentanyl , 1991, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[19]  A. Kopman Pancuronium, gallamine, and d-tubocurarine compared: is speed of onset inversely related to drug potency? , 1989, Anesthesiology.

[20]  R. Miller,et al.  The Neuromuscular Pharmacology of Neostigmine in Infants and Children , 1983, Anesthesiology.

[21]  J. Viby-Mogensen,et al.  Clinical assessment of neuromuscular transmission. , 1982, British journal of anaesthesia.

[22]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine. , 1980, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[23]  H. Neitlich Increased plasma cholinesterase activity and succinylcholine resistance: a genetic variant. , 1966, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[24]  R. Tovell,et al.  ANESTHESIA FOR ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY , 1954, Anesthesiology.