A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety and Attitudes toward Microcomputers

This study developed and tested a path model of individual difference variables as antecedents of computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers among managers. Results of path analysis of survey data gatheredfrom 166 managers provided moderate support for the proposed model and the pattern of linkages specified among the variables. Results showed education is negatively related to computer anxiety, and external locus of control and math anxiety contribute to increased computer anxiety. Managers' age, education, external locus of control, and thefeeling-thinking dimension of cognitive style are directly related to attitudes toward microcomputers. However, math anxiety and external locus of control affect microcomputer attitudes only indirectly, through their effect on computer anxiety, which is the strongest predictor of negative attitudes toward microcomputers. Implications for the design and success of management information systems involving microcomputers, andfuture research are discussed.

[1]  J. Taylor,et al.  A personality scale of manifest anxiety. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  A. W. Bendig,et al.  The development of a short form of the manifest anxiety scale. , 1956, Journal of consulting psychology.

[3]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[4]  D. R. Heise.  Problems in Path Analysis and Causal Inference , 1969 .

[5]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[6]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[7]  H. Triandis.  Attitude and attitude change , 1971 .

[8]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[9]  T. Ostrom,et al.  An Abbreviated Measure of Internal-External Locus of Control , 1974 .

[10]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Mathematics Learning and the Sexes: A Review. , 1974 .

[11]  R. Hauser,et al.  The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis , 1975 .

[12]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Man-Machine Planning Systems: A Cognitive Style Examination of Interactive Decision Making , 1977 .

[13]  M. L. Bariff,et al.  Cognitive and Personality Tests for the Design of Management Information Systems , 1977 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Impact of Cognitive Styles on Information System Design , 1978, MIS Q..

[16]  R. Billings,et al.  Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: Criticisms and suggestions. , 1978 .

[17]  N. Betz.  Prevalence, Distribution, and Correlates of Math Anxiety in College Students. , 1978 .

[18]  S. W. Cochran,et al.  Internal and External Locus of Control as Determinants of Decision Making in a Game of Skill , 1978 .

[19]  R. Zmud.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[20]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[21]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  The unmeasured variables problem in path analysis. , 1980 .

[22]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  The Influence of Decision Style on Decision Making Behavior , 1980 .

[23]  M. Coovert,et al.  Locus of Control as a Predictor of Users' Attitude toward Computers , 1980 .

[24]  S. Tobias,et al.  Anxiety and Mathematics: An Update. , 1980 .

[25]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Behavioral and Organizational Considerations in the Design of Information Systems and Processes for Planning and Decision Support , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[26]  A. Raub.  CORRELATES OF COMPUTER ANXIETY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS , 1981 .

[27]  J. Sherman.  Girls' and Boys' Enrollments in Theoretical Math Courses: A Longitudinal Study. , 1981 .

[28]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Use of Computer-Based Graphics in Decision Making , 1981 .

[29]  Mary J. Reece,et al.  The Development and Validation of a Measure of General Attitudes toward Computers , 1982 .

[30]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Measuring user attitudes in MIS research: a review , 1982 .

[31]  Richard K. Russell,et al.  A Comparison of Cue-Controlled Relaxation and Study Skills Counseling in the Treatment of Mathematics Anxiety. , 1982 .

[32]  Adeline Naiman,et al.  Women Technophobia and Computers. , 1982 .

[33]  Stephan Arndt,et al.  Secretarial attitudes towards word processors as a function of familiarity and locus of control , 1983 .

[34]  D. Robey.  Cognitive Style and DSS Design: A Comment on Huber's Paper , 1983 .

[35]  David H. Benson.  A Field Study of End User Computing: Findings and Issues , 1983, MIS Q..

[36]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1984 .

[37]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[38]  Marlaine E. Lockheed.  Women, girls, and computers: A first look at the evidence , 1985 .

[39]  Arvid J. Bloom,et al.  An anxiety management approach to computerphobia. , 1985 .

[40]  F. Dambrot,et al.  Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers , 1985 .

[41]  T. Bikson,et al.  Differential experiences of men and women in computerized offices , 1985 .

[42]  Gita Z. Wilder,et al.  Gender and computers: Two surveys of computer-related attitudes , 1985 .

[43]  Nancy K. Napier,et al.  Train Right or Don't Train at All. , 1985 .

[44]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Attitudinal and Behavioral Correlates of Computer Anxiety , 1986 .

[45]  Geoffry S. Howard.  Computer Anxiety and the Use of Microcomputers in Management , 1986 .

[46]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Personal Computing Trends and Problems: An Empirical Study , 1986, MIS Q..

[47]  Faith D. Gilroy,et al.  Computer Anxiety: Sex, Race and Age , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[48]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? , 1986, CACM.

[49]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Modeling vs. Non Modeling: The Impact on Self-Efficacy and Performance in Computer Training for Managers. , 1987 .

[50]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management , 1987 .

[51]  Francis Neville Pavri,et al.  An Empirical Study Of The Factors Contributing To Microcomputer Usage , 1988 .

[52]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage , 1989, Inf. Manag..