MCNPX, MONK, and ERANOS analyses of the YALINA Booster subcritical assembly

Abstract This paper compares the numerical results obtained from various nuclear codes and nuclear data libraries with the YALINA Booster subcritical assembly (Minsk, Belarus) experimental results. This subcritical assembly was constructed to study the physics and the operation of accelerator-driven subcritical systems (ADS) for transmuting the light water reactors (LWR) spent nuclear fuel. The YALINA Booster facility has been accurately modeled, with no material homogenization, by the Monte Carlo codes MCNPX (MCNP/MCB) and MONK. The MONK geometrical model matches that of MCNPX. The assembly has also been analyzed by the deterministic code ERANOS. In addition, the differences between the effective neutron multiplication factor and the source multiplication factors have been examined by alternative calculational methodologies. The analyses include the delayed neutron fraction, prompt neutron lifetime, generation time, neutron flux profiles, and spectra in various experimental channels. The accuracy of the numerical models has been enhanced by accounting for all material impurities and the actual density of the polyethylene material used in the assembly (the latter value was obtained by dividing the total weight of the polyethylene by its volume in the numerical model). There is good agreement between the results from MONK, MCNPX, and ERANOS. The ERANOS results show small differences relative to the other results because of material homogenization and the energy and angle discretizations.The MCNPX results match the experimental measurements of the 3 He(n,p) reaction rates obtained with the californium neutron source.

[2]  Y. Gohar,et al.  YALINA facility a sub-critical Accelerator- Driven System (ADS) for nuclear energy research facility description and an overview of the research program (1997-2008). , 2010 .

[3]  H. G. Hughes,et al.  Nuclear energy generation and waste transmutation using an accelerator-driven intense thermal neutron source , 1992 .

[4]  Cristian Rabiti,et al.  Pulse superimposition calculational methodology for estimating the subcriticality level of nuclear fuel assemblies , 2009 .

[5]  J. Cetnar.  General solution of Bateman equations for nuclear transmutations , 2006 .

[6]  G. Rimpault,et al.  Neutronic Studies in Support of Accelerator-Driven Systems: The MUSE Experiments in the MASURCA Facility , 2004 .

[7]  B. Verboomen,et al.  Monte Carlo Calculation of the Effective Neutron Generation Time , 2006 .

[8]  W. Kley.  Remarks concerning the efficiency of a booster neutron source , 1982 .

[9]  D. C. Hill,et al.  The U.S. accelerator transmutation of waste program , 2001 .

[10]  N. Burgio,et al.  Neutronic Analyses of the Trade Demonstration Facility , 2004 .

[11]  D. Parsons,et al.  On the definition of neutron lifetimes in multiplying and non-multiplying systems , 1997 .

[12]  J. F. Briesmeister.  MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[13]  Y. Gohar,et al.  YALINA analytical benchmark analyses using the deterministic ERANOS code system. , 2009 .

[14]  MCB1C2 bug on thermal reactors , 2006 .

[15]  G. Chiba,et al.  Calculation of Effective Delayed Neutron Fraction Using a Modified k-Ratio Method , 2009 .

[16]  R. K. Meulekamp,et al.  Calculating the Effective Delayed Neutron Fraction with Monte Carlo , 2006 .