Global and local impacts of UK renewable energy policy

Energy policies within one country or region can have significant global impacts, with unforeseen consequences. As an example, the EU requirements for 20% of final energy to be derived from renewable sources by 2020 feeds in to a UK target for renewable energy to make up 15% of UK final energy demand by 2020; the implications of this are investigated and found to have global repercussions. In order to achieve the UK target it is essential that the existing strategies for delivering wind power and coupling it to the grid are successful but there is an additional, greater, challenge. A large part of the UK renewables target will need to be met by the use of biomass and we show here that the amounts of biomass needed far exceed the supply capacity of the UK; imports will dominate the supply. The imports required are far greater than present day UK imports of coal with substantial potential implications; globally for biomass markets with potential impact on food supply and deforestation, and locally for UK infrastructure in shipping, ports, rail, road freight, electricity transmission networks and the coal industry. The way that a single country's response to a regional energy strategy can have global implications are investigated using one reference scenario for future UK fuel needs as an example. A strong outcome is that to implement this level of rapid change in the energy supply chain whilst avoiding negative impacts in a rapidly expanding global market there is a need for synchronisation of policies across economies as a whole, including anticipated effects beyond national borders, rather than policy measures in separate, isolated areas such as energy.

[1]  David Paré,et al.  Using ecosystem CO2 measurements to estimate the timing and magnitude of greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy , 2013 .

[2]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error , 2009, Science.

[3]  Oliver R. Inderwildi,et al.  Biofuels and synthetic fuels in the US and China: A review of Well-to-Wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions with the impact of land-use change , 2010 .

[4]  H. M. Junginger,et al.  Production and trading of biomass for energy – an overview of the global status , 2007 .

[5]  Daniel K. Y. Tan,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis for agave-derived bioethanol , 2011 .

[6]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[7]  Jussi Heinimö,et al.  Methodological aspects on international biofuels trade: International streams and trade of solid and liquid biofuels in Finland , 2008 .

[8]  Christian Wirth,et al.  Regional carbon dioxide implications of forest bioenergy production , 2011 .

[9]  Bjart Holtsmark Material for : Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt , 2011 .

[10]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[11]  T. Searchinger Global Consequences of the Bioenergy Greenhouse Gas Accounting Error , 2012 .

[12]  Oliver R. Inderwildi,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis for algae-derived biodiesel , 2011 .

[13]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[14]  H. MacLean,et al.  Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Oliver R. Inderwildi,et al.  Quo vadis biofuels , 2009 .

[16]  N. Bird,et al.  Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel , 2012 .

[17]  M. Harmon,et al.  Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production , 2012 .