The Interplay of Networking Activities and Internal Knowledge Actions for Subsidiary Influence within MNCs

Knowledge-based and network-based activities are known determinants of foreign subsidiary influence. We demonstrate that the interaction between these factors is essential in understanding how subsidiaries gain influence within an MNC. We test this using data on 184 foreign-owned subsidiaries in the UK. The results indicate that the possession of strategic resources (knowledge or embedded relations) increases subsidiary influence only when the knowledge is transferred back to headquarters. Importantly, the impact of subsidiary–headquarters embeddedness, external embeddedness and knowledge development on influence is mediated by the extent of reverse knowledge transfer. This mediating role sheds new light on the antecedents to subsidiary influence.

[1]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations† , 2008 .

[2]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological globalisation and innovative centres: the role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy , 1999 .

[3]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[4]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Accounting for the strengths of MNC subsidiaries: the case of foreign-owned firms in Denmark , 1999 .

[5]  P. Buckley,et al.  The Governance of the Multinational Enterprise: Insights from Internalization Theory , 2011 .

[6]  Catherine Maguire,et al.  The Relationship between Job and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from a Remote Mining Community , 2000 .

[7]  J. I. Canales,et al.  Subsidiary Strategy: The Embeddedness Component , 2007 .

[8]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Patterns of Strategic Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1984 .

[9]  Bernard L. Simonin.  An Empirical Investigation of the Process of Knowledge Transfer in International Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[10]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[11]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[12]  K. Provan.  The Federation as an Interorganizational Linkage Network , 1983 .

[13]  John Cantwell,et al.  MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates , 2005 .

[14]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance , 2004 .

[15]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation , 2003 .

[16]  A. Rugman,et al.  Subsidiary‐specific advantages in multinational enterprises , 2001 .

[17]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  BUILDING FIRM-SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: THE ROLE OF SUBSIDIARY INITIATIVE , 1998 .

[18]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  The good, the bad, and the ugly: Technology transfer competence, rent-seeking, and bargaining power , 2012 .

[19]  Riikka M. Sarala,et al.  Knowledge development in MNC subsidiaries: The influence of MNC internal and external knowledge and control mechanisms , 2008 .

[20]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[21]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Knowledge Accumulation and Dissemination in MNEs: A Practice-Based Framework , 2011 .

[22]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view , 2007 .

[23]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[24]  M. Schulz.  THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[25]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions , 1999 .

[26]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  In Search of Centre of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations , 2000 .

[27]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[28]  Simone Strambach,et al.  The contribution of KIBS to innovation in cities: an evolutionary and institutional perspective , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[30]  Hui Tan,et al.  Knowledge Accession and Knowledge Acquisition in Strategic Alliances: The Impact of Supplementary and Complementary Dimensions , 2009 .

[31]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  Subsidiary Embeddedness and Competence Development in MNCs A Multi-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[32]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance , 2005 .

[33]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge Flows, Subsidiary Power and Rent-Seeking within MNCs , 2004 .

[34]  C. Handy.  Balancing corporate power: a new Federalist paper. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[35]  Tim Blumentritt.  Foreign Subsidiaries' Government Affairs Activities , 2003 .

[36]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[37]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE, BARGAINING POWER, AND THE INSTABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES , 1997 .

[38]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[39]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  J. Johanson,et al.  Development of MNC Centres of Excellence , 2000 .

[41]  P. N. Figueiredo,et al.  The Role of Dual Embeddedness in the Innovative Performance of MNE Subsidiaries: Evidence from Brazil , 2011 .

[42]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[43]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[44]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[45]  Kent E. Neupert,et al.  National Culture, Transaction Costs, and the Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary , 2000 .

[46]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness , 2005 .

[47]  Ian Miles,et al.  Knowledge intensive business services: prospects and policies , 2005 .

[48]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[49]  Robert Nobel,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Reverse Technology Transfer1 , 2001 .

[50]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[51]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[52]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[53]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  Procedural Justice in Performance Evaluation: The Role of Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Voice in Performance Appraisal Discussions , 1995 .

[54]  Alison M. Konrad,et al.  Formalized Hrm Structures: Coordinating Equal Employment Opportunity Or Concealing Organizational Practices? , 1995 .

[55]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  Measuring the power of information in organizations , 2007 .

[56]  Nikos C. Varsakelis,et al.  The impact of national culture on international business performance: the case of foreign firms in Greece , 2002 .

[57]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[58]  Ulf Andersson,et al.  Subsidiary importance in the MNC: What role does internal embeddedness play? , 2011 .

[59]  M. Yamin.  An Evolutionary Analysis of Subsidiary Innovation and 'Reverse' Transfer in Multinational Companies , 1999 .

[60]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[61]  K. Cook,et al.  The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[62]  M. Geppert,et al.  Institutional Influences on Manufacturing Organization in Multinational Corporations: The ‘Cherrypicking’ Approach , 2006 .

[63]  J. D. Couger.  E pluribus computum , 1986 .

[64]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  Mediating Effects in Reverse Knowledge Transfer Processes , 2012 .

[65]  Kazuhiro Asakawa,et al.  Organizational tension in international R&D management : The case of Japanese firms , 2001 .

[66]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[67]  Lawrence G. Franko,et al.  Global corporate competition: Who's winning, who's losing, and the R&D factor as one reason why , 1989 .

[68]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[69]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Subsidiary Influence and Corporate Learning - Centres of Excellence in Danish Foreign-Owned Firms , 2000 .

[70]  Andreas Koch,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INNOVATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICE SECTOR , 2008 .

[71]  J. Birkinshaw.  How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost , 1996 .

[72]  Zhaleh Najafi-Tavani,et al.  Knowledge-intensive business services: does dual embeddedness matter? , 2012 .

[73]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[74]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[75]  Jens Gammelgaard,et al.  Subsidiary role development: The effect of micro-political headquarters–subsidiary negotiations on the product, market and value-added scope of foreign-owned subsidiaries , 2006 .

[76]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? , 2010 .

[77]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .