Analysis with support vector machine shows HIV-positive subjects without infectious retinitis have mfERG deficiencies compared to normal eyes.

PURPOSE To test the following hypotheses: (1) eyes from individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have electrophysiologic abnormalities that manifest as multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) abnormalities; (2) the retinal effects of HIV in immune-competent HIV individuals differ from the effects in immune-incompetent HIV individuals; (3) strong machine learning classifiers (MLCs), like support vector machine (SVM), can learn to use mfERG abnormalities in the second-order kernel (SOK) to distinguish HIV from normal eyes; and (4) the mfERG abnormalities fall into patterns that can be discerned by MLCs. We applied a supervised MLC, SVM, to determine if mfERGs in eyes from patients with HIV differ from mfERGs in HIV-negative controls. METHODS Ninety-nine HIV-positive patients without visible retinopathy were divided into 2 groups: (1) 59 high-CD4 individuals (H, 104 eyes), 48.5 +/- 7.7 years, whose CD4 counts were never observed below 100, and (2) 40 low-CD4 individuals (L, 61 eyes), 46.2 +/- 5.6 years, whose CD4 counts were below 100 for at least 6 months. The normal group (N, 82 eyes) had 41 age-matched HIV-negative individuals, 46.8 +/- 6.2 years. The amplitude and latency of the first positive curve (P1, hereafter referred to as a) and the first negative curve (N1, referred to as b) in the SOK of 103 hexagon patterns of the central 28 degrees of the retina were recorded from the eyes in each group. SVM was trained and tested with cross-validation to distinguish H from N and L from N. SOK was chosen as a presumed detector of inner retinal abnormalities. Classifier performance was measured with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve to permit comparison of MLCs. Improvement in performance and identification of subsets of the most important features were sought with feature selection by backward elimination. RESULTS In general, the SOK b-parameters separated L from N and H from N better than a-parameters, and latency separated L from N and H from N better than amplitude. In the HIV groups, on average, amplitude was diminished and latency was extended. The parameter that most consistently separated L from N and H from N was b-latency. With b-latency, SVM learned to distinguish L from N (AUROC = 0.7.30 +/- 0.044, P = .001 against chance [0.500 +/- 0.051]) and H from N (0.732 +/- 0.038, P = .0001 against chance) equally well. With best-performing subsets (21 out of 103 hexagons) derived by backward elimination, SVM distinguished L from N (0.869 +/- 0.030, P < .00005 against chance) and H from N (0.859 +/- 0.029, P <.00005 against chance) better than SVM with the full set of hexagons. Mapping the top 10 hexagon locations for L vs N and H vs N produced no apparent pattern. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that mfERG SOK abnormalities develop in the retina of HIV-positive individuals. The new finding of equal severity of b-latency abnormalities in the low- and high-CD4 groups indicates that good immune status under highly active antiretroviral therapy may not protect against retinal damage and, by extension, damage elsewhere. SOKs are difficult for human experts to interpret. Machine learning classifiers, such as SVM, learn from the data without human intervention, reducing the need to rely on human skills to interpret this test.

[1]  F. Goebel,et al.  Deficits in perimetric performance in patients with symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  W. Freeman,et al.  Multifocal electroretinography in HIV-positive patients without infectious retinitis. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  M. Schneck,et al.  Towards optimal filtering of “standard” multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) recordings: findings in normal and diabetic subjects , 2004, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  T. Lai,et al.  Multifocal electroretinographic changes in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine therapy. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Machine Learning Classifiers Can Detect Subtle Field Defects in Eyes of HIV Subjects , 2007 .

[6]  W. Freeman,et al.  Pattern of early visual field loss in HIV-infected patients. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  W. Freeman,et al.  Objective analysis of retinal damage in HIV-positive patients in the HAART era using OCT. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  The field topography of ERG components in man—I. The photopic luminance response , 1992, Vision Research.

[9]  C. Luu,et al.  Multifocal electroretinogram in adults and children with myopia. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  M. Schneck,et al.  A multifocal electroretinogram model predicting the development of diabetic retinopathy , 2006, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[11]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[12]  R. Carr,et al.  The nature and extent of retinal dysfunction associated with diabetic macular edema. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  W. Freeman,et al.  Hyperreflective sign in resolved cotton wool spots using high-resolution optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography ophthalmoscopy. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[14]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Prevalence and significance of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related retinal microvasculopathy. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  F. Yu,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and color vision in HIV-infected individuals without infectious retinopathy. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Haitao Li,et al.  The clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography: a systematic review. , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[17]  W. Freeman,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF RETINAL FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH HIV WITHOUT INFECTIOUS RETINITIS BY MULTIFOCAL ELECTRORETINOGRAM AND AUTOMATED PERIMETRY , 2006, Retina.

[18]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Unsupervised machine learning with independent component analysis to identify areas of progression in glaucomatous visual fields. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[21]  L Brigatti,et al.  Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  W. Freeman,et al.  In vivo histology of cotton-wool spots using high-resolution optical coherence tomography. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  B Brown,et al.  Multifocal ERG changes in glaucoma. , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  B. Glasgow,et al.  A quantitative and cartographic study of retinal microvasculopathy in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. , 1994, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  W. Freeman,et al.  Visual field loss in HIV-positive patients without infectious retinopathy. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  W. Freeman,et al.  SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY DEMONSTRATION OF RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER DAMAGE IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS–POSITIVE PATIENTS WITHOUT INFECTIOUS RETINITIS , 2007, Retina.

[27]  M A Bearse,et al.  Mapping of retinal function in diabetic retinopathy using the multifocal electroretinogram. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[29]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) , 2003, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[30]  A J Adams,et al.  Multifocal electroretinogram delays reveal local retinal dysfunction in early diabetic retinopathy. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  J. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  The Rod-Mediated Multifocal Electroretinogram in Aging and in Early Age-Related Maculopathy , 2006, Current eye research.

[32]  F. Goebel,et al.  Impairment of colour contrast sensitivity and neuroretinal dysfunction in patients with symptomatic HIV infection or AIDS. , 1993, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Inner retinal contributions to the multifocal electroretinogram: patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[34]  V. Iragui,et al.  Pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in HIV infection , 1996, Neurology.

[35]  W. Freeman,et al.  Morphometric comparisons of optic nerve axon loss in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[36]  Donald C Hood,et al.  Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique , 2000, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[37]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[38]  F. Goebel,et al.  HIV-related ocular microangiopathic syndrome and color contrast sensitivity. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[39]  R. Carr,et al.  Local cone and rod system function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[40]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[41]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Identifying inner retinal contributions to the human multifocal ERG , 1999, Vision Research.

[42]  A. Vaag,et al.  Effect of short-term hyperglycemia on multifocal electroretinogram in diabetic patients without retinopathy. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  M H Goldbaum,et al.  Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.