1th Pacific-asia Conference on Information Systems 26. Student-centred Assessments and Their Impact on Learning – an Is Case Study

In higher education, one can find many different assessment methods ranging from the most traditional examination based assessment to computer-based on-line assessment and many other innovative assessment practices. Yet, achieving a high level of positive impact of assessment on student learning is always a major concern among academic practitioners. Choosing the right set of assessment modes, designing the assessment activities and evaluating their impact on student learning are some of the major challenges. This challenge is more pronounced in the recently emerging Information Systems (IS) programmes as there is an ever-growing wide variety of assessment methods matching with the ever-changing tools and techniques that evolve in the computer hardware and software disciplines. In such a dynamic context, IS courses in higher education are faced with a very short life-cycle and hence do not have the luxury of experimenting different assessment modes from time to time. They need to arrive at the right combination of assessments based on the prevailing situation. It is therefore a question as to which assessment methods are the best to be adopted and what is the impact of such assessments on student learning. This paper proposes a pragmatic four-step student-centred approach to identify and design suitable assessment methods and to examine their impact on student learning. The student-centred approach is illustrated through a study conducted for a particular IS course in a higher education setting. Due to the generic nature of this approach, it could be adopted in courses from other areas as well.

[1]  Kate Ashcroft,et al.  Researching into assessment and evaluation in colleges and universities , 1996 .

[2]  B. Fraser,et al.  A Study of Computer-Assisted Learning Environments in Singapore , 1994 .

[3]  D. Hargreaves.  Student Learning and Assessment Are Inextricably Linked , 1997 .

[4]  Peter Knight.  Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Staff and Educational Development Series. , 1995 .

[5]  Effie Maclellan,et al.  Assessment for Learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students , 2001 .

[6]  G. Boulton‐Lewis.  Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[7]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[8]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning , 2004 .

[9]  C. C. Gibson,et al.  Interpersonal Dynamics and Group Development in Computer Conferencing. , 1998 .

[10]  H. G. Murray,et al.  THE IMPACT OF FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE EVALUATION OF TEACHING IN NORTH AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES , 1984 .

[11]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students' learning experiences during an experiment , 1998 .

[12]  M. Chi.  Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[13]  Greg Ryan,et al.  Assessing the Practicum , 1996 .

[14]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[15]  Clare Brindley,et al.  Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes , 1998 .

[16]  B. Kniveton.  Student Perceptions of Assessment Methods , 1996 .

[17]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[18]  G. Ng,et al.  Undergraduate Students in a Computer Engineering Course: A Perspective of their Learning Approaches and Motivation Factors , 1997 .

[19]  Janet Carter,et al.  Teaching Delivery Issues: Lessons from Computer Science , 2002, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[20]  Stephen Farrow,et al.  Group Learning and Group Assessment on Undergraduate Computing Courses in Higher Education in the UK: results of a survey , 1997 .

[21]  Josie Taylor,et al.  Talking about Multimedia: a layered design framework , 1997 .

[22]  Francisco Rosales,et al.  Automatic management of laboratory work in mass computer engineering courses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[23]  John T. Gorgone.  Information technology: an adolescent in the arena , 2002, SGCS.

[24]  S. E. Little,et al.  A Project-Based Approach to Information Systems Design for Undergraduates , 1989, Aust. Comput. J..

[25]  R. Stiggins.  Student-centered classroom assessment , 1994 .

[26]  D. Boud.  Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary? , 1995 .

[27]  P. Knight,et al.  Assessing learners in higher education , 1998 .

[28]  Gregory K. W. K. Chung,et al.  Issues in the Computer-based Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving , 2003 .

[29]  M.J. Oudshoorn,et al.  Simulating real-life software engineering situations in the classroom , 1996, Proceedings 1996 International Conference Software Engineering: Education and Practice.

[30]  Ronald Paul Hill,et al.  Managing Across Generations in the 21st Century , 2002 .

[31]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Collaborative learning and computer‐supported groups , 1999 .

[32]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  The profession of IT: The IT schools movement , 2001, Communications of the ACM.