Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice

Over the past decades, we have witnessed calls for greater transdisciplinary engagement between scientific and societal actors to develop more robust answers to complex societal challenges. Although there seems to be agreement that these approaches might nurture innovations of a new kind, we know little regarding the research practices, their potential, and the limitations. To fill this gap, this article investigates a funding scheme in the area of transdisciplinary sustainability research. It offers a detailed analysis of the imaginaries and expectations on which the funding scheme rests and how researchers actually practice transdisciplinarity within the respective projects. Identifying three ideal typical models of science–society relations at work, attention is paid to how, where, and when societal and scientific arenas get (dis-)entangled. This article discusses (1) the tensions between classical academic values and efforts to open research to society, (2) the prevailing power structures that make societal participation challenging, (3) the importance of place and technopolitical cultures, and (4) how temporal project structures impede more radical openings to new ways of knowledge production. We finally emphasize that transdisciplinary knowledge production can only become a serious option for addressing societal challenges if broader changes are made to the knowledge regimes in place.

[1]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[2]  K. Knorr-Cetina The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1985 .

[3]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  Constructing `Do-able' Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment , 1987 .

[4]  B. Wynne Knowledges in Context , 1991 .

[5]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[6]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[7]  Lorraine Daston,et al.  The Moral Economy of Science , 1995, Osiris.

[8]  T. Gieryn,et al.  A Space for Place in Sociology , 2000 .

[9]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[10]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  The Potential of Transdisciplinarity , 2001 .

[11]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[12]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[13]  Rohit Parikh,et al.  States of Knowledge , 2002, WoLLIC.

[14]  S. Jasanoff States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[15]  B. Latour Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern , 2004, Critical Inquiry.

[16]  A. Clarke Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn , 2005 .

[17]  J. Annan,et al.  Situational Analysis , 2005 .

[18]  S. Jasanoff Designs on Nature , 2005 .

[19]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[20]  A. Stirling Precaution, foresight and sustainability: reflection and reflexivity in the governance of technology , 2006 .

[21]  A. Stirling Precaution, Foresight and Sustainability: Reflection and Reflexivity in the Governance of Science and Technology , 2006 .

[22]  B. Godin The Linear Model of Innovation , 2006 .

[23]  Arie Rip,et al.  TAKING EUROPEAN KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY SERIOUSLY Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission , 2007 .

[24]  Noortje Marres,et al.  The Issues Deserve More Credit , 2007 .

[25]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake , 2007 .

[26]  E. Carlson :Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States , 2008 .

[27]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[28]  Edward J. Hackett,et al.  The Snowbird Charrette: Integrative Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Environmental Research Design , 2009 .

[29]  U. Felt,et al.  Coming to Terms with Biomedical Technologies in Different Technopolitical Cultures: A Comparative Analysis of Focus Groups on Organ Transplantation and Genetic Testing in Austria, France, and the Netherlands , 2010 .

[30]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea , 2009 .

[31]  Morgan Meyer The Rise of the Knowledge Broker , 2010 .

[32]  Michaela Mueller Acting in An Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy , 2011 .

[33]  W. Stiles,et al.  Coming to Terms , 2004 .

[34]  M. Lamont Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation , 2012 .

[35]  U. Felt,et al.  Challenging Participation in Sustainability Research , 2012 .

[36]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[37]  Judith Igelsböck,et al.  Growing into what? The (un-)disciplined socialisation of early stage researchers in transdisciplinary research , 2013 .

[38]  Science in Society: caring for our futures in turbulent times , 2013 .

[39]  송위진,et al.  사회에 책임지는 과학기술혁신 :Responsible Research and Innovation 논의 동향 , 2013 .