How do new ventures grow? Firm capabilities, growth strategies and performance

While new venture growth performance has been studied extensively, little work has been done to examine the complex strategic choices through which growth is pursued and attained. Building on the resource-based view and social capital perspective, this study develops a conceptual framework that links combinations of ventures' (1) technological, (2) financial, and (3) networking capabilities to different growth strategies in terms of organic growth, partnership, and acquisition. We further assess the mechanisms through which a new venture's growth choices affect firm performance. Using data from 238 new high-tech ventures in China, we find that new ventures with different resource combinations follow different growth strategies. While partnership growth leads to greater product diversity, and acquisition is more effective in realizing firm internationalization, both lead to a better chance of survival of new ventures. In addition, the study explicates the role of technological capability in moderating the relationship between growth strategies and new venture performance.

[1]  G. Bruton,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies: Where Are We Today and Where Should the Research Go in the Future , 2007 .

[2]  Mike W. Peng.  How entrepreneurs create wealth in transition economies , 2001 .

[3]  D. Slevin,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior , 1991 .

[4]  Steven H. Hanks,et al.  Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance , 1994 .

[5]  M. Zeng,et al.  Japanese investors' choice of acquisitions vs. startups in the US: the role of reputation barriers and advertising outlays , 2004 .

[6]  Gideon D. Markman,et al.  Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs' success , 2000 .

[7]  K. Gleason,et al.  Born globals, the choice of globalization strategy, and the market's perception of performance , 2007 .

[8]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[9]  K. Zhou,et al.  On what should firms focus in transitional economies? A study of the contingent value of strategic orientations in China , 2007 .

[10]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[11]  J. Birkinshaw.  Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations : The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives , 1997 .

[12]  Melissa S. Baucus,et al.  Consensus in franchise organizations: A cooperative arrangement among entrepreneurs , 1996 .

[13]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms , 2001 .

[14]  Joseph E. McCann,et al.  Patterns of growth, competitive technology, and financial strategies in young ventures , 1991 .

[15]  Lois M. Shelton.  Scale Barriers and Growth Opportunities: A Resource-Based Model of New Venture Expansion , 2005 .

[16]  Choonwoo Lee,et al.  Internal capabilities, external linkages, and performance. A study on technology-based ventures , 2001 .

[17]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Survival of high tech firms: The effects of diversity of product-market portfolios, patents, and trademarks , 2008 .

[18]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Resources, Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Perceptions , 2007 .

[19]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures , 1996 .

[20]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[21]  Angelo S. DeNisi,et al.  Modeling new venture performance: An analysis of new venture strategy, industry structure, and venture origin☆ , 1992 .

[22]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance , 2006 .

[23]  K. Hatten,et al.  Further evidence on the validity of the self typing paragraph approach: Miles and snow strategic , 1995 .

[24]  D. Audretsch,et al.  New Venture Growth: A Review and Extension , 2006 .

[25]  S. Birley,et al.  Personal networks and firm competitive strategy—A strategic or coincidental match? , 1994 .

[26]  David R. King,et al.  Effects of Firm R&D Investment and Environment on Acquisition Likelihood , 2006 .

[27]  K. Praveen Parboteeah,et al.  Team-Level Antecedents of Individuals' Knowledge Networks , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[28]  M. M. Hart,et al.  From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[29]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING , 2007 .

[30]  Francesca Pissarides.  Is lack of funds the main obstacle to growth? ebrd's experience with small- and medium-sized businesses in central and eastern europe , 1999 .

[31]  Andrea L. Larson.  Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance☆ , 1991 .

[32]  Dennis P. Slevin,et al.  Pioneers and followers: Competitive tactics, environment, and firm growth , 2000 .

[33]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[34]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[35]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance , 1997 .

[36]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form , 1997 .

[37]  G. Meyer,et al.  Industry environments and new venture formations in U.S. manufacturing: A conceptual and empirical analysis of demand determinants , 1996 .

[38]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[39]  M. Lounsbury.  Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy and the Acquisition of Resources , 2001 .

[40]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Partnering strategies and performance of SMEs' international joint ventures , 2006 .

[41]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Can entrepreneurial firms benefit from product piracy , 2008 .

[42]  M. Dowling,et al.  Licensing as a commercialisation strategy for new technology-based firms , 2004 .

[43]  J. Brüderl,et al.  Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations , 1992 .

[44]  W. Mitchell,et al.  The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival , 1995 .

[45]  Stephen Hill,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm , 1981 .

[46]  W. Bogner,et al.  Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance:Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment , 2000 .

[47]  Francisco J. Acedo,et al.  Speed of internationalization and entrepreneurial cognition: Insights and a comparison between international new ventures, exporters and domestic firms , 2007 .

[48]  Hans Landström,et al.  FINANCIAL BOOTSTRAPPING IN SMALL BUSINESSES: EXAMINING SMALL BUSINESS MANAGERS' RESOURCE ACQUISITION BEHAVIORS , 2001 .

[49]  G. Bruton,et al.  Resources of the firm, Russian high-technology startups, and firm growth , 2002 .

[50]  Hernan Riquelme,et al.  Do Venture Capitalists' Implicit Theories on New Business Success/Failure have Empirical Validity? , 2002 .

[51]  C. Brush,et al.  Businesses without glamour? an analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms , 1999 .

[52]  J. Pennings,et al.  Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures , 2001 .

[53]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[54]  J. Jarillo.  Entrepreneurship and growth: the strategic use of external resources , 1989 .

[55]  K. Ramachandran,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation and networking: Some Indian evidence , 1993 .

[56]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  A Multidimensional Model of Venture Growth , 2001 .

[57]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[58]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation , 2008 .

[59]  Kineta H. Hung,et al.  When Does Guanxi Matter? Issues of Capitalization and Its Dark Sides: , 2008 .

[60]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[61]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[62]  Gary K. Jones,et al.  Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition , 2001 .

[63]  A. Cooper,et al.  Challenges in Predicting New Firm Performance , 1993 .

[64]  Stefan Wally,et al.  Personal and Structural Determinants of the Pace of Strategic Decision Making , 1994 .

[65]  S. Shane,et al.  Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research , 1994 .

[66]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures , 1993 .

[67]  Terry M. Coalter,et al.  Context, Cognition, and Common Method Variance: Psychometric and Verbal Protocol Evidence , 1996 .

[68]  Yigang Pan,et al.  The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes , 2000 .

[69]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between entrepreneur leadership behavior and new venture performance , 2006 .

[70]  Martin Niederkofler.  The evolution of strategic alliances: Opportunities for managerial influence , 1991 .

[71]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries , 1996 .

[72]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .