Centralised versus Decentralised Control Reconfiguration for Collaborating Underwater Robots

Abstract The present paper introduces an approach to fault-tolerant reconfiguration for collaborating underwater robots. Fault-tolerant reconfiguration is obtained using the virtual actuator approach, Steffen (2005). The paper investigates properties of a centralised versus a decentralised implementation and assesses the capabilities under communication constraints between the individual robots. In the centralised case, each robot sends information related to its own status to a unique virtual actuator that computes the necessary reconfiguration. In the decentralised case, each robot is equipped with its own virtual actuator that is able to accommodate both local faults and faults within a collaborating unit. The paper discusses how this is done through exploiting structural information (e.g. thruster configuration) for each participant in the cooperation. A test scenario is presented as a case in which an underwater drill needs to be transported and positioned by three collaborating robots as part of an underwater autonomous operation.

[1]  Jana Fuhrmann,et al.  Guidance And Control Of Ocean Vehicles , 2016 .

[2]  Nilanjan Sarkar,et al.  Fault tolerant control of an autonomous underwater vehicle under thruster redundancy: simulations and experiments , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[3]  G. N. Roberts,et al.  Thruster fault diagnosis and accommodation for open-frame underwater vehicles , 2004 .

[4]  Daqi Zhu,et al.  An Active Fault-Tolerant Control Method Ofunmanned Underwater Vehicles with Continuous and Uncertain Faults , 2008 .

[5]  Nilanjan Sarkar,et al.  Fault-accommodating thruster force allocation of an AUV considering thruster redundancy and saturation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  Junku Yuh,et al.  Fault-tolerant System Design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Odin: an Experimental Study , 1999, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[7]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Tor Arne Johansen,et al.  Control allocation - A survey , 2013, Autom..

[9]  Junku Yuh,et al.  Experimental study of fault-tolerant system design for underwater robots , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[10]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Robust control mixer method for reconfigurable control design using model matching , 2007 .

[11]  F. Hanson,et al.  High bandwidth underwater optical communication. , 2008, Applied optics.

[12]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Guidance Laws for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2009 .

[13]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control: Fossen/Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control , 2011 .

[14]  Zhenyu Yang,et al.  The robust control mixer module method for control reconfiguration , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[15]  Maria Letizia Corradini,et al.  An Actuator Failure Tolerant Control Scheme for an Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.