Characteristics associated with antenatally unidentified small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial

To identify the clinical characteristics and patterns of ultrasound use amongst pregnancies with an antenatally unidentified small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) fetus, compared with those in which SGA is identified, to understand how to design interventions that improve antenatal SGA identification.

[1]  Anna L. David,et al.  Effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol on the DEtection of Small for GestatioNal age fetus: process evaluation from the DESiGN cluster randomised trial , 2022, Implementation Science.

[2]  A. Copas,et al.  Improving antenatal detection of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetus: economic evaluation of Growth Assessment Protocol , 2022, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  N. Marlow,et al.  Reduced fetal growth velocity and weight loss are associated with adverse perinatal outcome in fetuses at risk of growth restriction. , 2022, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  N. Marlow,et al.  Evaluation of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) for antenatal detection of small for gestational age: The DESiGN cluster randomised trial , 2022, PLoS medicine.

[5]  Walter Muruet Gutierrez,et al.  Using electronic patient records to assess the effect of a complex antenatal intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial—data management experience from the DESiGN Trial team , 2021, Trials.

[6]  U. Sovio,et al.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2021, Health technology assessment.

[7]  C. Mckinlay,et al.  Detection of small for gestational age babies and perinatal outcomes following implementation of the Growth Assessment Protocol at a New Zealand tertiary facility: An observational intervention study , 2020, Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  A. Tabor,et al.  Why we succeed and fail in detecting fetal growth restriction: A population‐based study , 2020, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[9]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Reduction of stillbirths in England from 2008 to 2017 according to uptake of the Growth Assessment Protocol: 10‐year population‐based cohort study , 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  C. Taboada,et al.  Accuracy of Estimated Fetal Weight in Third Trimester [33A] , 2020 .

[11]  C. Lees,et al.  Comparing the relation between ultrasound‐estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses , 2019, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[12]  M. Jakubiak,et al.  Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort , 2019, PloS one.

[13]  N. Concin,et al.  Fetal weight estimation at term – ultrasound versus clinical examination with Leopold’s manoeuvres: a prospective blinded observational study , 2019, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[14]  D. Lawlor,et al.  The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial , 2019, Trials.

[15]  F. Figueras,et al.  Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  M. Permezel,et al.  Why we miss fetal growth restriction: Identification of risk factors for severely growth‐restricted fetuses remaining undelivered by 40 weeks gestation , 2018, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[17]  P. Sheehan,et al.  Introduction of a customised growth chart protocol increased detection of small for gestational age pregnancies in a tertiary Melbourne hospital , 2018, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[18]  B. Gerber,et al.  Accuracy of immediate antepartum ultrasound estimated fetal weight and its impact on mode of delivery and outcome - a cohort analysis , 2018, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[19]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Fetal growth surveillance – Current guidelines, practices and challenges , 2018, Ultrasound.

[20]  J. Milner,et al.  The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review , 2018, Ultrasound.

[21]  F. Figueras,et al.  Evidence‐based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[23]  J. Pell,et al.  Customised and Noncustomised Birth Weight Centiles and Prediction of Stillbirth and Infant Mortality and Morbidity: A Cohort Study of 979,912 Term Singleton Pregnancies in Scotland , 2017, PLoS medicine.

[24]  Roman Goldenberg,et al.  Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries , 2016, The Lancet.

[25]  Lena Osterhagen,et al.  Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys , 2016 .

[26]  H. Aksoy,et al.  Influence of maternal body mass index on sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to scheduled delivery , 2015, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[27]  B. Blondel,et al.  Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[28]  M. Cowie.  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. , 2015, European heart journal.

[29]  A. Rebarber,et al.  The effectiveness of antepartum surveillance in reducing the risk of stillbirth in patients with advanced maternal age. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[30]  E. Goto.  Prediction of low birthweight and small for gestational age from symphysis-fundal height mainly in developing countries: a meta-analysis , 2013, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[31]  Everett F Magann,et al.  Prenatal Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction in Newborns Classified as Small for Gestational Age: Correlates and Risk of Neonatal Morbidity , 2013, American Journal of Perinatology.

[32]  F. Prefumo,et al.  Effects of antenatal recognition and follow‐up on perinatal outcomes in small‐for‐gestational age infants delivered after 36 weeks , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[33]  Asad Malik,et al.  Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study , 2013, BMJ.

[34]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Birthweight with Gestation and Maternal Characteristics in Live Births and Stillbirths , 2012, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[35]  J. Gardosi,et al.  Accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term , 2011, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[36]  S. Chauhan,et al.  Inadequate identification of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses at an urban teaching hospital , 2010, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[37]  Andre Francis,et al.  Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  P G Lindqvist,et al.  Does antenatal identification of small‐for‐gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[39]  B. Stray-Pedersen,et al.  Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death , 2004, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[40]  Evangelos Alexopoulos,et al.  Case-control study of factors associated with intrauterine fetal deaths. , 2004, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[41]  O. Razum,et al.  Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany, low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases , 1998, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[42]  T J Cole,et al.  British 1990 growth reference centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference fitted by maximum penalized likelihood. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[43]  L. Kean,et al.  Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population , 1996 .

[44]  B. Backe,et al.  Effectiveness of antenatal care: a population based study , 1993, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[45]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. , 1991, Radiology.