Big data would not lie: prediction of the 2016 Taiwan election via online heterogeneous information

The prevalence of online media has attracted researchers from various domains to explore human behavior and make interesting predictions. In this research, we leverage heterogeneous data collected from various online platforms to predict Taiwan’s 2016 general election. In contrast to most existing research, we take a “signal” view of heterogeneous information and adopt the Kalman filter to fuse multiple signals into daily vote predictions for the candidates. We also consider events that influenced the election in a quantitative manner based on the so-called event study model that originated in the field of financial research. We obtained the following interesting findings. First, public opinions in online media dominate traditional polls in Taiwan election prediction in terms of both predictive power and timeliness. But offline polls can still function on alleviating the sample bias of online opinions. Second, although online signals converge as election day approaches, the simple Facebook “Like” is consistently the strongest indicator of the election result. Third, most influential events have a strong connection to cross-strait relations, and the Chou Tzu-yu flag incident followed by the apology video one day before the election increased the vote share of Tsai Ing-Wen by 3.66%. This research justifies the predictive power of online media in politics and the advantages of information fusion. The combined use of the Kalman filter and the event study method contributes to the data-driven political analytics paradigm for both prediction and attribution purposes.

[1]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  140 Characters to Victory?: Using Twitter to Predict the UK 2015 General Election , 2015, ArXiv.

[2]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Twitter mood predicts the stock market , 2010, J. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Todd Rogers,et al.  Unacquainted callers can predict which citizens will vote over and above citizens’ stated self-predictions , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  P. Metaxas,et al.  Social Media and the Elections , 2012, Science.

[5]  Johan Bos,et al.  Predicting the 2011 Dutch Senate Election Results with Twitter , 2012 .

[6]  S. Rutherford,et al.  Using Google Trends for Influenza Surveillance in South China , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  From polls to votes to seats: Forecasting the 2010 British general election , 2011 .

[8]  D. Fell Party Politics in Taiwan: Party Change and the Democratic Evolution of Taiwan, 1991-2004 , 2006 .

[9]  Simon Jackman,et al.  Pooling the polls over an election campaign , 2005 .

[10]  D. S. Hillygus,et al.  Changing the Clock The Role of Campaigns in the Timing of Vote Decision , 2016 .

[11]  G. Enli,et al.  PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .

[12]  J. Bollen,et al.  More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Predicting consumer behavior with Web search , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[15]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[17]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  What is a Social Network Worth? Facebook and Vote Share in the 2008 Presidential Primaries , 2008 .

[18]  H. Stanley,et al.  Quantifying Trading Behavior in Financial Markets Using Google Trends , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[19]  H Eugene Stanley,et al.  Quantifying the semantics of search behavior before stock market moves , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  C. Dweck,et al.  Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Padmini Srinivasan,et al.  GOP primary season on twitter: "popular" political sentiment in social media , 2013, WSDM.

[22]  Taha Yasseri,et al.  Wikipedia traffic data and electoral prediction: towards theoretically informed models , 2016, EPJ Data Science.

[23]  Vijayalakshmi Atluri,et al.  Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series , 2010, ICWSM.

[25]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Tweet Analysis for Real-Time Event Detection and Earthquake Reporting System Development , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[26]  Christopher Wlezien,et al.  From Polls to Votes to Seats: Forecasting the 2015 British general election , 2016 .

[27]  Tomaso Aste,et al.  When Can Social Media Lead Financial Markets? , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  M. Broersma,et al.  BETWEEN BROADCASTING POLITICAL MESSAGES AND INTERACTING WITH VOTERS , 2012 .

[30]  Late-deciding voters in presidential elections , 1994 .

[31]  Panagiotis Takis Metaxas,et al.  Limits of Electoral Predictions Using Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[32]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Predicting the Future with Social Media , 2010, Web Intelligence.

[33]  Min Song,et al.  Analyzing the Political Landscape of 2012 Korean Presidential Election in Twitter , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[34]  A. Healy,et al.  Irrelevant events affect voters' evaluations of government performance , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  A. Mackinlay,et al.  Event Studies in Economics and Finance , 1997 .

[36]  Matthew C. MacWilliams,et al.  Forecasting Congressional Elections Using Facebook Data , 2015, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[37]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Online social networks and offline protest , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[38]  Jake M. Hofman,et al.  Prediction and explanation in social systems , 2017, Science.

[39]  Emiliano De Cristofaro,et al.  Paying for Likes?: Understanding Facebook Like Fraud Using Honeypots , 2014, Internet Measurement Conference.

[40]  D. Walther,et al.  Picking the winner(s) : Forecasting elections in multiparty systems , 2015 .

[41]  Jiebo Luo,et al.  A Multifaceted Approach to Social Multimedia-Based Prediction of Elections , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[42]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[43]  Yuan Zuo,et al.  Complementary Aspect-Based Opinion Mining , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[44]  David G. Rand,et al.  Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 presidential election , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? , 2011, ePart.

[46]  John J. Binder The Event Study Methodology Since 1969 , 1997 .