Theoretical Aspects of Cursorial Adaptations in Dinosaurs

A theoretical review of the physical constraints on cursorial animals provides a list of the morphological correlates of superior running ability, with emphasis on osteological features. This list includes the following adaptations: relatively long limbs; small forelimbs (bipeds only); freely rotating scapula (quadrupeds only); hinge-like joints; short and massive proximal limb elements; long and slender distal limb elements; radius-ulna and tibia-fibula which are reduced to single elements; manus and pes with pronounced median symmetery; digitigrade to unguligrade stance; interlocked or fused metapodials; reduced or lost inner and outer digits, and snap ligaments sometimes present. These adaptations are ubiquitous among phylogenetically diverse animals which run and may be regarded as inevitable in any cursor. Theoretical arguments predict a lower speed potential for very large and very small animals, and this conclusion is supported by empirical data which point to an optimum body mass of about 50 kg for a cursor. By utilizing these findings and a system of four levels of running ability (graviportal, mediportal, subcursorial, cursorial), it is possible to evaluate the running potential of dinosaurs. Quadrupedal dinosaurs had fewer cursorial features than bipeds, and large bipeds had fewer than small bipeds. Sauropods and stegosaurs were graviportal; ankylosaurs and large ceratopsians were low to intermediate grade mediportal; prosauropods were high-grade mediportal; large ornithopods were subcursorial; and large theropods were subcursorial to cursorial. Small ceratopsians were dynamic bipeds and were high-grade subcursorial. Small bipedal ornithischians and small theropods were cursorial and were the fastest of the dinosaurs, but were probably not as fast as the best modern runners.

[1]  J. Hulke III. Polacanthus Foxii, a large undescribed dinosaur from the Wealden formation in the Isle of Wight , 1881, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[2]  J. Hulke XV. Polacanthus foxii, a large undescribed dinosaur from the Wealden formation in the Isle of Wight , 1881, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[3]  J. B. Hatcher Diplodocus (Marsh): its osteology, taxonomy, and probable habits, with a restoration of the skeleton , 1901, Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum.

[4]  C. W. Gilmore Osteology of the Jurassic reptile Camptosaurus, with a revision of the species of the genus, and descriptions of two new species , 1909 .

[5]  William K. Gregory,et al.  NOTES ON THE PRINCIPLES OF QUADRUPEDAL LOCOMOTION AND ON THE MECHANISM OF HE LIMBS IN HOOFED ANIMALS , 1912 .

[6]  L. Lambe The Cretaceous Theropodous dinosaur Gorgosaurus , 1917 .

[7]  Henry Fairfield Osborn,et al.  Camarasaurus, Amphicoelias, and other sauropods of Cope , 1919 .

[8]  R. S. Lull The Cretaceous armored dinosaur, Nodosaurus textilis Marsh , 1921 .

[9]  B. Brown,et al.  Preliminary notices of skeletons and skulls of Deinodontidae from the Cretaceous of Alberta. American Museum novitates ; no. 89 , 1923 .

[10]  Central Asiatic Expeditions,et al.  Psittacosaurus and Protiguanodon : two Lower Cretaceous iguanodonts from Mongolia , 1924 .

[11]  C. Stock Cenozoic Gravigrade edentates of western North America : with special reference to the Pleistocene Megalonychinae and Mylodontidae of Rancho La Brea , 1925 .

[12]  R. Hooley On the Skeleton of Iguanodon atherfieldensis sp. nov., from the Wealden Shales of Atherfield (Isle of Wight) , 1925, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London.

[13]  J. GRAHAM KERR,et al.  The Osteology of the Reptiles , 1926, Nature.

[14]  John H. Ostrom,et al.  The Origin of Birds , 1926 .

[15]  F. Huene The Carnivorous Saurischia in the Jura and Cretaceous Formations, principally in Europe , 1926 .

[16]  R. S. Lull,et al.  A Revision of the Ceratopsia or Horned Dinosaurs , 2015 .

[17]  C. Sternberg A new Ornithomimus with complete abdominal cuirass , 1933 .

[18]  R. S. Lull,et al.  Hadrosaurian Dinosaurs of North America , 1942 .

[19]  S. Welles NEW JURASSIC DINOSAUR FROM THE KAYENTA FORMATION OF ARIZONA , 1954 .

[20]  V. Wynne-Edwards Biology of Mammals , 1958, Nature.

[21]  D. Klingener The comparative myology of four dipodoid rodents (genera Zapus, Napaeozapus, Sicista, and Jaculus). , 1964 .

[22]  C. Gans,et al.  The functional significance of muscle architecture--a theoretical analysis. , 1965, Ergebnisse der Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte.

[23]  I. Linn,et al.  The Natural History of Mammals , 1965 .

[24]  Mechanics of one- and two-joint muscles. American Museum novitates ; no. 2319 , 1968 .

[25]  D. Russell A new specimen of Stenonychosaurus from the Oldman Formation (Cretaceous) of Alberta , 1969 .

[26]  E. P. Walker,et al.  Mammals of the World , 1969 .

[27]  D. Russell A skeletal reconstruction of Leptoceratops gracilis from the upper Edmonton Formation (Cretaceous) of Alberta , 1970 .

[28]  J. Cracraft The functional morphology of the hind limb of the domestic pigeon, Columba livia. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 144, article 3 , 1971 .

[29]  R. C. Weast Handbook of chemistry and physics , 1973 .

[30]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Energetic Cost of Locomotion in Kangaroos , 1973, Nature.

[31]  R. A. Thulborn,et al.  A new heterodontosaurid dinosaur (Reptilia: Ornithischia) from the Upper Triassic Red Beds of Lesotho , 1974 .

[32]  M. Hildebrand Analysis of Vertebrate Structure , 1974 .

[33]  R. Bakker Experimental and Fossil Evidence for the Evolution of Tetrapod Bioenergetics , 1975 .

[34]  W. Coombs Sauropod habits and habitats , 1975 .

[35]  A. Crompton,et al.  A complete skeleton of the Late Triassic ornithischian Heterodontosaurus tucki , 1976, Nature.

[36]  P. Béland,et al.  Running Dinosaurs , 1976, Nature.

[37]  R. A. Thulborn RELATIONSHIPS OF THE LOWER JURASSIC DINOSAUR SCELIDOSAURUS HARRISONII , 1977 .

[38]  B. Brown,et al.  PRELIMINARY NOTICES OF SKELETONS AND SKULLS OF DEINODONTIDE FROM THE CRETACEOUS OF ALBERTA , 2022 .

[39]  E. H. Colbert The Weights of Dinosaurs , 2004 .