Motivations and practices for cheating in Pokémon GO

Since the emergence of video computer games in the early 70's, the concept of "cheating" has been a hot issue in video gaming research. Adding mobility and location-based capabilities to computer games introduces a whole new set of behaviours, motivations and justifications that challenge gaming communities to reconsider what constitutes "cheating", and what is simply an acceptable extension of game play. Using the specific case of Pokémon GO, we investigate players' perceptions on cheating in this mobile location-based game. In our research, we identified 10 ways that players circumvent the rules of Pokémon GO. Through analysis of online forums, field observations, interviews, and a focus group with local players, we realised that players' attitudes vary as to what constitutes "cheating", and whether playing outside the rules is acceptable. We found players "cheat" to enhance game experience, to compensate for limitations in the game's design, or to keep up with other cheaters. While this has been observed in online gaming before, our study contributes to research by relating these specifically to the game's mobile location-based nature. We offer implications for design of location-based games.

[1]  Madeline E. Smith,et al.  Butler lies from both sides: actions and perceptions of unavailability management in texting , 2013, CSCW '13.

[2]  Jaakko Stenros,et al.  Pervasive games in ludic society , 2007, Future Play.

[3]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Continuity in Multi-Device Interaction: An Online Study , 2016, NordiCHI.

[4]  Xue Liu,et al.  Location Cheating: A Security Challenge to Location-Based Social Network Services , 2011, 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[5]  Mia Consalvo,et al.  Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames , 2007 .

[6]  Melanie Grunwald,et al.  Convergence Culture Where Old And New Media Collide , 2016 .

[7]  Mika Luimula,et al.  Understanding Players' Experiences in Location-based Augmented Reality Mobile Games: A Case of Pokémon Go , 2017, CHI PLAY.

[8]  Mia Consalvo,et al.  Cheating, Social Network Games and the Role of Platforms , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  J. Blackburn,et al.  An Analysis of (Bad) Behavior in Online Video Games , 2014 .

[10]  Jason C. Yip,et al.  It wasn't really about the Pokémon: Parents' Perspectives on a Location-Based Mobile Game , 2017, CHI.

[11]  David Myers,et al.  Play Redux: The Form of Computer Games , 2010 .

[12]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Cheating Behaviors in Online Gaming , 2009, HCI.

[13]  Matei Ripeanu,et al.  Cheating in Online Games: A Social Network Perspective , 2014, TOIT.

[14]  Mia Consalvo,et al.  Cheating in social network games , 2015, New Media Soc..

[15]  Tuomas Kari,et al.  Behavior change types with Pokémon GO , 2017, FDG.

[16]  Steve Chi-Yin Yuen,et al.  Augmented Reality: An Overview and Five Directions for AR in Education , 2011 .

[17]  Brian Randell,et al.  A systematic classification of cheating in online games , 2005, NetGames '05.

[18]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  The Geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and Problematic Effects on Places and Movement , 2017, CHI.

[19]  Kai K. Kimppa,et al.  The ethical significance of cheating in online computer games , 2005 .

[20]  Aung Pyae,et al.  A player engagement model for an augmented reality game: a case of pokémon go , 2016, OZCHI.

[21]  Susanna Paasovaara,et al.  Understanding collocated social interaction between Pokémon GO players , 2017, MUM.

[22]  Chantal Wouters,et al.  An exploratory study , 2003 .

[23]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  The phone rings but the user doesn't answer: unavailability in mobile communication , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[24]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Using Affinity Diagrams to Evaluate Interactive Prototypes , 2015, INTERACT.

[25]  Mika Luimula,et al.  Investigating Players' Engagement, Immersion, and Experiences in Playing Pokémon Go , 2017, Creativity & Cognition.

[26]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[28]  M. Montola.  Exploring the Edge of the Magic Circle : Defining Pervasive Games , 2005 .

[29]  Adriana Iamnitchi,et al.  Bad Apples Spoil the Fun: Quantifying Cheating in Online Gaming , 2016, ICWSM.

[30]  Diane Gromala,et al.  Chasing Lovely Monsters in the Wild, Exploring Players' Motivation and Play Patterns of Pokémon Go: Go, Gone or Go Away? , 2017, CSCW Companion.

[31]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[32]  Matthias Böhmer,et al.  Impact of location-based games on phone usage and movement: a case study on Pokémon GO , 2017, MobileHCI.

[33]  Shawn M. Doherty,et al.  An Analysis of Expressed Cheating Behaviors in Video Games , 2014 .

[34]  Svend Brinkmann,et al.  Interview: Det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk , 2015 .

[35]  Brett Stevens,et al.  Contextually-Ambiguous Pervasive Games: An Exploratory Study , 2009, DiGRA Conference.

[36]  Yeoreum Lee,et al.  How and Why I Cheated On My App: User Experience of Cheating Physical Activity Exergame Applications , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[37]  Michel Deriaz,et al.  TrustPos Model: Trusting in Mobile Users' Location , 2013, MobiWIS.

[38]  J. Huizinga.  Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .

[39]  Janne Paavilainen,et al.  The Pokémon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream , 2017, CHI.

[40]  Vivian Hsueh-hua Chen,et al.  Group identification as a mediator of the effect of players’ anonymity on cheating in online games , 2015, Behav. Inf. Technol..