Ambulation training of neurological patients on the treadmill with a new Walking Assistance and Rehabilitation Device (WARD)

Study design: Patients with neurological walking impairment were rehabilitated with a new system, consisting of an apparatus to constantly relieve the body weight and a treadmill: The Walking Assistance and Rehabilitation Device (WARD). Patients were evaluated before and after rehabilitation with clinical scales and physiological measurements.Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of the WARD in improving walking capability in these patients.Setting: The study was carried out in a clinical environment (IRCCS S. Lucia, Rehabilitation Hospital, Rome, Italy).Methods: Seven patients (six with spinal cord injuries, one with brain injury) underwent a 1–2 month training period with the WARD. During the WARD training the body weight constant unloading (BWCU) applied to the patient through the WARD was regularly evaluated. Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production and heart rate were measured in order to obtain energy and cardiac costs of walking. These measurements were carried out while walking with the WARD at an appropriate treadmill speed (ATS) and in the open field at the most comfortable speed (MCS). All measurements, in addition to clinical scores related to the walking capability, were carried out at the beginning of the WARD training period (BWT) and at the end (EWT). At the EWT the patients were tested walking with the WARD observing the same BWT conditions (same ATS and BWCU), referred to as beginning conditions second measurements (BCSM). The relationships between physiological costs and ATS were described through second order polynomial regression curves and studied.Results: Comparing the data obtained at the BWT and EWT, the following results were found significantly different: (1) Clinical scores improved; (2) All patients increased their ATS; (3) The BWCU was reduced; (4) The Walking Energy Cost (WEC) and the Walking Cardiac Cost (WCC) measured when walking with the WARD at the ATS improved in all patients; and (5) The WEC and WCC measured in the open field improved in all patients. The WEC vs ATS curve found at the EWT in the BCSM was found significantly different from the BWT curve, demonstrating a major improvement due to the WARD training.Conclusion: Despite some limitations due to sample size and functional ambulation scale, this study has demonstrated that the WARD training is effective in improving the walking capability and efficiency of the patients.

[1]  Takatoshi Ide Expectation for Medical and Healthcare Robotics , 1990 .

[2]  V. Dietz,et al.  Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[3]  M. Maležič,et al.  Restoration of gait in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients by treadmill training with partial body-weight support. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  K H Mauritz,et al.  Restoration of gait by combined treadmill training and multichannel electrical stimulation in non-ambulatory hemiparetic patients. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[6]  P. Zamparo,et al.  The energy cost of level walking in patients with hemiplegia , 1995, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[7]  H Barbeau,et al.  A treadmill apparatus and harness support for evaluation and rehabilitation of gait. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  N. Mayo,et al.  Motor and functional recovery after stroke: accuracy of physical therapists' predictions. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  H. Hermens,et al.  Paraplegic locomotion: a review , 1996, Spinal Cord.

[10]  V. Castellano,et al.  Rehabilitation of walking for paraplegic patients by means of a treadmill , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[11]  A. Wernig,et al.  Laufband Therapy Based on‘Rules of Spinal Locomotion’is Effective in Spinal Cord Injured Persons , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[12]  P. E. di Prampero,et al.  The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water. , 1986 .

[13]  F Felici,et al.  Cost of walking and locomotor impairment. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  P. D. di Prampero,et al.  The Energy Cost of Human Locomotion on Land and in Water* , 1986, International journal of sports medicine.

[15]  V. Castellano,et al.  WARD: a pneumatic system for body weight relief in gait rehabilitation , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  T R Holford,et al.  MASCIS evaluation of open field locomotor scores: effects of experience and teamwork on reliability. Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study. , 1996, Journal of neurotrauma.

[17]  A. Wernig,et al.  Laufband locomotion with body weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries , 1992, Paraplegia.

[18]  R. D'ambrosia,et al.  Reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation (RGO II). Part I: Performance evaluation of 70 paraplegic patients. , 1997, Orthopedics.

[19]  H Barbeau,et al.  The effects of parallel bars, body weight support and speed on the modulation of the locomotor pattern of spastic paretic gait. A preliminary communication , 1994, Paraplegia.