The impact of social factors on the content of care. Treatment of ischemic heart disease at a public and a voluntary hospital.

To assess the impact of social factors on the content of care, panels of patients with ischemic heart disease at a public and its affiliated voluntary hospital were followed up through their acute hospitalizations and 3 months after discharge. Data were collected from firsthand observation of rounds, chart review, and a 3-month patient follow-up survey. Among patients for whom cardiac catheterization was indicated, 100% from the voluntary hospital underwent this procedure compared with 41% from the public institution. For patients for whom exercise stress testing was indicated, 90% from the voluntary hospital compared with 50% from the public institution underwent the procedure. Factors observed to contribute to these patterns emanated from the hospital setting as well as from the patients' social environment, including difficulties in arranging transfers for procedures, obstacles to coordinating inpatient and ambulatory care, and patient problems in keeping outpatient appointments.

[1]  E. Hannan,et al.  Interracial Access to Selected Cardiac Procedures for Patients Hospitalized with Coronary Artery Disease in New York State , 1991, Medical care.

[2]  A M Epstein,et al.  The association of payer with utilization of cardiac procedures in Massachusetts. , 1990, JAMA.

[3]  A M Epstein,et al.  Case mix and resource utilization by uninsured hospital patients in the Boston metropolitan area. , 1989, JAMA.

[4]  E. Ford,et al.  Coronary arteriography and coronary bypass survey among whites and other racial groups relative to hospital-based incidence rates for coronary artery disease: findings from NHDS. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[5]  A. Epstein,et al.  Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in Massachusetts. , 1989, JAMA.

[6]  M. Pauly,et al.  Access to Kidney Transplantation: Has the United States Eliminated Income and Racial Differences? , 1988 .

[7]  P Diehr,et al.  Relationship between patient source of payment and the intensity of hospital services. , 1988, Medical care.

[8]  C. Kjellstrand Age, sex, and race inequality in renal transplantation. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  C G Chute,et al.  Social and economic factors in the choice of lung cancer treatment. A population-based study in two rural states. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  W. McWhorter,et al.  Black/white differences in type of initial breast cancer treatment and implications for survival. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[11]  R. Brook,et al.  How coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness. , 1987, JAMA.

[12]  L. Aiken,et al.  Uncompensated care by hospitals or public insurance for the poor. Does it make a difference? , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  N. Lurie,et al.  Termination from Medi-Cal--does it affect health? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Lofland,et al.  Analyzing Social Settings , 1971 .