The Minimal Group Paradigm in Virtual Teams

As established by Social Identity Theory (SIT), belonging to specific groups is part of our identity and constitutes the feeling of “who I am” and “who I am not”. Social groups are thus an essential part of life – not only for social interactions but also for defining part of our self-conception. Early experiments found that even minimal, entirely random in-group/out-group categorizations are sufficient to cause a status gain of the in-group, while simultaneously discriminating the out-group. In this paper we transfer this so-called Minimal Group Paradigm (MGP) to online collaboration. Two empirical studies with a total of N=190 participants were conducted to replicate the Minimal Group Paradigm in different virtual settings (informal vs. work) and with different degrees of information available about the supposed group members. Overall, results show that indeed in-group favoritism could be elicited in totally anonymous virtual settings without any real interaction. Yet, the Minimal Group effect varied according to the complexity of the clues: in-group favoritism was stronger in settings with less information available. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

[1]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[2]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[3]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[4]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[5]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Communication and commitment in an online game team , 2012, CHI.

[6]  Jean-Éric Pelet,et al.  The effect of colors of e-commerce websites on consumer mood, memorization and buying intention , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  H. Ibarra.  Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation , 1999 .

[8]  T. Koschmann,et al.  CSCL 2 : carrying forward the conversation , 2003 .

[9]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[10]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[11]  Holly S. Slay,et al.  Professional identity construction: Using narrative to understand the negotiation of professional and stigmatized cultural identities , 2011 .

[12]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Find What Binds: Building Social Capital in an Iranian NGO Community System , 2004 .

[13]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[14]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[15]  Christian Filk,et al.  Rezension: T. Koschmann, R. Hall, N. Miyake (Eds.): CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation , 2003, Z. für Medienpsychologie.

[16]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  CHAPTER 12 – Applying Social Psychological Theory to the Problems of Group Work , 2002 .

[17]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Increasing commitment to online communities by designing for social presence , 2011, CSCW.

[18]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[19]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[20]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[21]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Organizing without formal organization: group identification, goal setting and social modeling in directing online production , 2012, CSCW.

[22]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes , 2001 .

[23]  Monique Janneck,et al.  Making the community a hospitable place ? identity, strong bounds and self-organisation in web-based communities , 2006, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[24]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Beyond being in the lab: using multi-agent modeling to isolate competing hypotheses , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[25]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[26]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Classification and quantitative judgement. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[27]  Markus Rohde,et al.  Building Social Capital in an Iranian NGO Community System , 2004 .

[28]  Monique Janneck,et al.  Community-Building with Web-Based Systems – Investigating a Hybrid Community of Students , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[29]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[30]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization , 2002 .

[31]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[32]  M. Huysman,et al.  Social Capital and Information Technology , 2004 .