Trends in oral anticoagulant choice for acute stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Japan: The SAMURAI‐NVAF Study

Background Large clinical trials are lack of data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for acute stroke patients. Aim To evaluate the choice of oral anticoagulants at acute hospital discharge in stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and clarify the underlying characteristics potentially affecting that choice using the multicenter Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-factor Assessment and Improvement-NVAF registry (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01581502). Method The study included 1192 acute ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (527 women, 77·7 ± 9·9 years old) between September 2011 and March 2014, during which three nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant oral anticoagulants were approved for clinical use. Oral anticoagulant choice at hospital discharge (median 23-day stay) was assessed. Results Warfarin was chosen for 650 patients, dabigatran for 203, rivaroxaban for 238, and apixaban for 25. Over the three 10-month observation periods, patients taking warfarin gradually decreased to 46·5% and those taking nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants increased to 48·0%. As compared with warfarin users, patients taking nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants included more men, were younger, more frequently had small infarcts, and had lower scores for poststroke CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED, admission National Institutes of Health stroke scale, and discharge modified Rankin Scale. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were started at a median of four-days after stroke onset without early intracranial hemorrhage. Patients starting nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants earlier had smaller infarcts and lower scores for the admission National Institutes of Health stroke scale and the discharge modified Rankin Scale than those starting later. Choice of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was independently associated with 20-day or shorter hospitalization (OR 2·46, 95% CI 1·87–3·24). Conclusions Warfarin use at acute hospital discharge was still common in the initial years after approval of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, although nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users increased gradually. The index stroke was milder and ischemia-risk indices were lower in nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users than in warfarin users. Early initiation of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants seemed safe.

[1]  J. Carroll,et al.  Letter by Saver et al regarding article, "Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association". , 2015, Stroke.

[2]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2014, Circulation.

[3]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2014, Circulation.

[4]  T. Miyata,et al.  Anticoagulation Intensity of Rivaroxaban for Stroke Patients at a Special Low Dosage in Japan , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  T. Ninomiya,et al.  Stroke and cerebrovascular diseases in patients with chronic kidney disease , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[6]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: An Asian perspective , 2014, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[7]  G. Lip,et al.  Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs): No longer new or novel , 2014, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[8]  Alexander Parkhomenko,et al.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2014, The Lancet.

[9]  Guidelines for Pharmacotherapy of Atrial Fibrillation (JCS 2013). , 2014, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[10]  E. Antman,et al.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  T. Kawada Letter by Kawada regarding article, "Dabigatran versus warfarin: effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and bleeding in Asians and non-Asians with atrial fibrillation". , 2013, Stroke.

[12]  K. Kimura,et al.  Early initiation of new oral anticoagulants in acute stroke and TIA patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation , 2013, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[13]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran Versus Warfarin: Effects on Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes and Bleeding in Asians and Non-Asians With Atrial Fibrillation , 2013, Stroke.

[14]  A. Camm,et al.  European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2012, European heart journal.

[16]  B. Lewis,et al.  Apixaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a subgroup analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial , 2012, The Lancet Neurology.

[17]  J. Le Heuzey,et al.  Clinical correlates of immediate success and outcome at 1-year follow-up of real-world cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a subgroup analysis of ROCKET AF , 2012, The Lancet Neurology.

[19]  Josef Coresh,et al.  Chronic kidney disease , 2012, The Lancet.

[20]  D. Atar,et al.  Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Maren S. Mayhew Dabigatran Versus Warfarin , 2011 .

[22]  R. Troughton,et al.  Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[24]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. , 2010, Chest.

[25]  K. Okumura,et al.  Guidelines for Pharmacotherapy of Atrial Fibrillation (JCS 2008) : Digest Version , 2010 .

[26]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Chest.

[27]  JCSJointWorkingGroup Guidelines for pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (JCS 2008): digest version. , 2010, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[28]  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  J. Cairns,et al.  nonvalvular atrial fibrillation , 2007 .

[31]  M. Rich,et al.  Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. , 2001, JAMA.

[32]  Martha J. Radford,et al.  Validation of Clinical Classification Schemes for Predicting Stroke: Results From the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation , 2001 .