Institutions globally have increasingly embraced Institutional Repositories (IRs) to collect, showcase, archive, and preserve their intellectual and scholarly output. Many benefits are gained from implementation of the platform including: the institution’s visibility, status and reputation is increased; authors get wider public access and visibility thus more citations for their work; long-term preservation of research; and the library benefits from its new role in information creation and distribution thus the opportunity to re-assert its importance in the face of declining user dependence on libraries for simple access to information (Sharif 2013).
Despite the high uptake of IRs to manage institutions’ digital resources more effectively, little has been written on the experience of cross-border implementation. This paper seeks to fill this gap by presenting unique lessons learnt from the implementation of Digital Commons (DC), a proprietary hosted institutional repository platform by Bepress. The platform is implemented across AKU’s 7 campuses in 5 countries (United Kingdom, Pakistan, Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania). The varying technological, economical, and cultural contexts of these countries have had effect on the implementation of the platform and have presented some unique and interesting lessons.
Cross-border implementation faces many distinctive challenges. From AKU experience, these include lack of a national body for co-ordinating IRs in majority of the countries where AKU is operating; and inequalities in technical expertise, internet access, extent of use, and social support. On the other hand, institutions receive immense benefits from cross-border implementation. Key benefits include: IR helps address the unevenness in availability of researchers’ output where Africa for instance accounts for only 2% of the world’s research output (Christian 2008); and implementation team benefits from networking with colleagues.
Being part of the implementation team and working collaboratively with the entire implementation team, the authors share the challenges and best practices learnt first-hand.
[1]
P Venkata Rao.
INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES : A KEY ROLE FOR LIBRARIES
,
2007
.
[2]
Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.
Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations
,
2007
.
[3]
S. Oliveira.
Benefits and Challenges of OA and Institutional Repository Implementation in Seventh-day Adventist University Libraries: An International Perspective
,
2011
.
[4]
Peter Gatiti,et al.
Towards successful implementation of an Institutional Repository in a cross-border environment
,
2014
.
[5]
Sheau-Hwang Chang,et al.
Institutional repositories: the library's new role
,
2003,
OCLC Syst. Serv..
[6]
Joan Giesecke,et al.
Institutional Repositories: Keys to Success
,
2011
.
[7]
Susan Gibbons,et al.
Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories
,
2005,
D Lib Mag..
[8]
Ashraf Sharif.
Implementing Institutional Repository (IR) system in a multi-campus international university: Nuts and bolts
,
2013
.
[9]
Patrick Mapulanga,et al.
Digitising library resources and building digital repositories in the University of Malawi Libraries
,
2013,
Electron. Libr..
[10]
Raym Crow,et al.
The case for institutional repositories : a SPARC position paper
,
2002
.
[11]
Carole L. Palmer,et al.
Identifying Factors of Success in CIC Institutional Repository Development - Final Report
,
2008
.