Exploring students’ reflective thinking practice, deep processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations

Recent research indicates that study processing strategies, effort, reflective thinking practice, and achievement goals are important factors contributing to the prediction of students’ academic success. Very few studies have combined these theoretical orientations within one conceptual model. This study tested a conceptual model that included, in particular, deep processing strategies, effort, mastery and performance‐approach goals, reflection, and critical thinking. We used causal modelling procedures to explore the direct and mediating effects of these theoretical orientations on students’ academic achievement and learning. Second‐ and third‐year undergraduates (n = 347; 151 women and 196 men) completed a number of inventories (e.g., the Reflective Thinking Questionnaire). LISREL 8.72 indicated an a posteriori model with direct effects of reflection and critical thinking on academic achievement and learning. Performance‐approach goals exerted a negative effect on academic achievement. Both mastery and performance‐approach goals also directed affected reflection, whereas deep processing strategies were directly affected by mastery goals and effort. Importantly, both reflection and effort were found to act as potent mediators. A one‐way MANOVA revealed no statistical difference between men and women in this theoretical framework.

[1]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. , 1995 .

[2]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Swee Noi Smith *,et al.  Learning approaches: examination type, discipline of study, and gender , 2005 .

[4]  T. Karsenti,et al.  Relations among competence beliefs, utility value, achievement goals, and effort in mathematics. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes , 1988 .

[6]  H. Marsh,et al.  Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. , 1997 .

[7]  The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[8]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[9]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[10]  H. Marsh Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. , 1990 .

[11]  D. Stipek,et al.  Learned helplessness in task-orienting versus performance-orienting testing conditions , 1989 .

[12]  Ngai-Ying Wong,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Psychosocial Environmental and Learning Approaches in the Hong Kong Classroom , 1998 .

[13]  B. Byrne Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[14]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. , 1999 .

[15]  J. Harackiewicz,et al.  Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. , 1996 .

[16]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Influences on cognitive engagement: epistemological beliefs and need for closure. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[17]  J. C. Núñez,et al.  Multiple goals, motivation and academic learning. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[18]  Lai Fong Chiu,et al.  Critical reflection , 2006 .

[19]  J. Meece,et al.  Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities , 1988 .

[20]  David Kember,et al.  The Relationship Between Approaches to Learning and Reflection Upon Practice , 2003 .

[21]  A. Elliot Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals , 1999 .

[22]  S. Dewitte,et al.  The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[23]  D. F. Lopez,et al.  Social cognitive influences on self-regulated learning: The impact of action-control beliefs and academic goals on achievement-related outcomes , 1999 .

[24]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Engagement in Academic Work: The Role of Learning Goals, Future Consequences, Pleasing Others, and Perceived Ability , 1996, Contemporary educational psychology.

[25]  A. Elliot,et al.  Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Shu-shen Shih Taiwanese Sixth Graders’ Achievement Goals and Their Motivation, Strategy Use, and Grades: An Examination of the Multiple Goal Perspective , 2005, The Elementary School Journal.

[27]  Thomas M. Haladyna,et al.  Personal and environmental influences on students' beliefs about effective study strategies , 1990 .

[28]  J. H. Steiger Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[29]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  The Development and Validation of Scales Assessing Students' Achievement Goal Orientations , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[30]  C. Dweck,et al.  Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Huy P Phan Unifying different theories of learning: theoretical framework and empirical evidence , 2008 .

[32]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[33]  Barry J. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. , 1997 .

[34]  C. Mariné,et al.  Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Goal Orientation, Cognitive Engagement, and Achievement: A Test of Dweck's Model with Returning to School Adults. , 2005 .

[35]  Huy P Phan Predicting change in epistemological beliefs, reflective thinking and learning styles: a longitudinal study. , 2008, The British journal of educational psychology.

[36]  Sergio Román,et al.  University students' academic performance: an integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[37]  C. Dweck,et al.  Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  F. Cano,et al.  Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[39]  Huy P. Phan,et al.  An Examination of Reflective Thinking, Learning Approaches, and Self‐Efficacy Beliefs at the University of the South Pacific: A path analysis approach , 2007 .

[40]  D. Watkins Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. , 2001 .

[41]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[43]  David Kember,et al.  Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking , 2000 .

[44]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[45]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[46]  Huy P Phan Amalgamation of future time orientation, epistemological beliefs, achievement goals and study strategies: empirical evidence established. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[47]  J. Mezirow Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning , 1991 .

[48]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[49]  A. Elliot,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL MODEL OF APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION , 1997 .

[50]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Reconstituting approaches to learning: A response to Webb , 1997 .

[51]  Learned Helplessness in Task-Orienting versus Performance-Orienting Testing Conditions. , 1989 .

[52]  Linda Fernsten,et al.  Portfolio assessment and reflection: enhancing learning through effective practice , 2005 .

[53]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies , 1996 .