The Forensic Analysis of Sediments Recovered from Footwear

The forensic analysis of sediments recovered from footwear has the potential to yield much useful information concerning the movements of a person before, during and after a crime has taken place. Three experimental studies and a number of examples of forensic casework provide insight into the complexity of the spatial distribution of geoforensic materials on the soles of footwear and the persistence of these materials over time on the soles and uppers. These findings have implications for both the geoforensic sampling protocols and procedures for footwear submitted for analysis in a criminal investigation and also for the analysis of any materials recovered. The preservation of sediment on a shoe sole will vary, with certain areas generally retaining more sediment than others. The sequential layering of sediments that have been transferred to the shoe will be preserved in some cases and in certain areas, but generally undergoes complex mixing. Such mixing of sediment from different sources occurs both across the shoe sole and also through time. It is therefore important to be aware of these variations when taking samples for analysis if representative samples are to be taken and meaningful interpretation of any analysis derived is to be effected. Furthermore, such mixing of pre-, syn- and post-forensic event sources has implications for the appropriateness of different analytical techniques. Visual identification techniques which are able to identify where such mixing has taken place are preferred to forms of analysis that require homogenisation of the sample prior to analysis, as this reduces the possibility of false negative or positive associations when undertaking comparison of samples in a forensic context. The context within which any sampling or analysis is undertaken is crucial for a meaningful and accurate interpretation of the geoforensic evidence.

[1]  H. Korpelainen,et al.  Forensic botany: usability of bryophyte material in forensic studies. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[2]  K W Smalldon,et al.  The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear. Part I--Fibre transference. , 1975, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[3]  Ruth M Morgan,et al.  The role of forensic geoscience in wildlife crime detection. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[4]  Peter A. Bull,et al.  Forensic geoscience and crime detection. Identification, interpretation and presentation in forensic geoscience , 2007 .

[5]  R. Morgan,et al.  Data Interpretation in Forensic Sediment and Soil Geochemistry , 2006 .

[6]  Mitul Vyas,et al.  Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and old adults , 2005, BMC geriatrics.

[7]  C. Brocard,et al.  Particle size analysis of soils under simulated scene of crime conditions: the interest of multivariate analyses. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[8]  R M Morgan,et al.  The transfer and persistence of trace particulates: experimental studies using clothing fabrics. , 2006, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[9]  R M Morgan,et al.  Sediment fingerprints: a forensic technique using quartz sand grains. , 2006, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[10]  Peter A. Bull,et al.  Multi-technique comparison of source and primary transfer soil samples: an experimental investigation’. A Comment. , 2005 .

[11]  E. Locard The Analysis of Dust Traces. Part III , 1930 .

[12]  K W Smalldon,et al.  The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear. Part III--a preliminary investigation of the mechanisms involved. , 1975, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[13]  Peter A. Bull,et al.  Forensic geoscience and crime detection , 2007 .

[14]  Raymond C. Murray,et al.  Forensic Geology: Earth Sciences and Criminal Investigation , 1975 .

[15]  R M Morgan,et al.  Multi-technique comparison of source and primary transfer soil samples: an experimental investigation by D Croft and K Pye. A comment. , 2004, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[16]  K. Walsh,et al.  Fine Resolution of Pollen Patterns in Limited Space: Differentiating a Crime Scene and Alibi Scene Seven Meters Apart , 1999 .

[17]  K. Walsh,et al.  Forensic Palynology: Variation in the Pollen Content of Soil on Shoes and in Shoeprints in Soil , 1999 .

[18]  Edmond Locard Dust and its Analysis , 1928 .

[19]  K. Wiggins,et al.  The transfer and persistence of small fragments of polyurethane foam onto clothing , 2002 .

[20]  Tacha Hicks,et al.  Transfer and persistence of glass fragments on garments , 1996 .

[21]  P A Bull,et al.  A critique of the present use of some geochemical techniques in geoforensic analysis. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[22]  D. Mildenhall Hypericum pollen determines the presence of burglars at the scene of a crime: an example of forensic palynology. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[23]  K W Smalldon,et al.  The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear. Part III--a preliminary investigation of the mechanisms involved. , 1975, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[24]  Ruth M Morgan,et al.  The forensic analysis of soils and sediment taken from the cast of a footprint. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[25]  Peter A. Bull,et al.  The philosophy, nature and practice of forensic sediment analysis , 2007 .

[26]  V. Bryant,et al.  Forensic palynology: why do it and how it works. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[27]  K. Pye,et al.  Multi-technique comparison of source and primary transfer soil samples: an experimental investigation. , 2004, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[28]  Ruth M. Morgan,et al.  A Forensic Geoscience Framework and Practice , 2008 .

[29]  C Roux,et al.  The transfer and persistence of automotive carpet fibres on shoe soles. , 1999, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[30]  N Rudin,et al.  The origin of evidence. , 2002, Forensic science international.