Trends in phenology of Betula pubescens across the boreal zone in Finland

Timing of plant phenophases is a useful biological indicator which shows how nature responds to the variation in climate. Thus, long phenological observation series help to estimate the impact of changing climate on forest plants. We investigated whether phenological patterns of downy birch Betula pubescens respond to warming climate and whether the intensity of the responses varies among phytogeographical zones. We studied data collected by the Finnish National Phenological Network from 30 observation sites across Finland during 1997–2006. The advancement in the timing of the earliest phenophase, bud burst, ranged from 0.7 days/year in southern boreal zone to 1.4 days/year in middle and northern boreal zones. Timing of bud burst was most clearly dependent on mean May temperatures. The intensity of the response to temperature increased from south to north. The advancement of bud burst resulted into a significant lengthening of the growth period by 1.2–1.6 days per year in northern and middle boreal zones, respectively, whereas the lengthening was not significant in the southern boreal zone. No trend was observed in the timing of autumn phenophases.

[1]  C. Symon,et al.  Arctic climate impact assessment , 2005 .

[2]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Phenology: Its Importance to the Global Change Community , 2002 .

[3]  Timo Sukuvaara,et al.  Timing of plant phenophases in Finnish Lapland in 1997-2006 , 2008 .

[4]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern , 2006 .

[5]  H. Hänninen Climate warming and the risk of frost damage to boreal forest trees: identification of critical ecophysiological traits. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[6]  K. Høgda,et al.  Growing seasons of Nordic mountain birch in northernmost Europe as indicated by long-term field studies and analyses of satellite images , 2006, International journal of biometeorology.

[7]  J. Pontailler,et al.  Climate Warming Postpones Senescence in High Arctic Tundra , 2004 .

[8]  Heikki Hänninen,et al.  Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: an ecophysiological approach to modelling of bud burst phenology , 1995 .

[9]  T. Ahti,et al.  Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe , 1968 .

[10]  Koen Kramer,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity of the phenology of seven European tree species in relation to climatic warming , 1995 .

[11]  Xuebin Zhang,et al.  Characteristics of Daily and Extreme Temperatures over Canada , 2001 .

[12]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Trends of spring time frost events and phenological dates in Central Europe , 2003 .

[13]  H. Tuomenvirta,et al.  Climate scenarios for FINADAPT studies of climate change adaptation. FINADAPT Working Paper 15 , 2005 .

[14]  Heikki Hänninen,et al.  Effects of photoperiod and temperature on the timing of bud burst in Norway spruce (Picea abies). , 1998, Tree physiology.

[15]  Risto Sarvas,et al.  Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees. II. Autumn dormancy and winter dormancy , 1974 .

[16]  P. Hari,et al.  Effects of dormancy and environmental factors on timing of bud burst in Betula pendula. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[17]  U. Meier,et al.  Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants , 1997 .

[18]  Robert D. Hollister,et al.  RESPONSES OF TUNDRA PLANTS TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING:META‐ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TUNDRA EXPERIMENT , 1999 .

[19]  M. D. Walker,et al.  Effects of interannual climate variation on phenology and growth of two alpine forbs , 1995 .

[20]  G. Kudo,et al.  Short‐term effects of simulated environmental change on phenology, leaf traits, and shoot growth of alpine plants on a temperate mountain, northern Japan , 1997 .

[21]  R. Häkkinen Analysis of bud-development theories based on long-term phenological and air temperature time series: application to Betula sp. leaves. , 1999 .

[22]  F. Wielgolaski,et al.  Some views on plants in polar and alpine regions , 2007 .

[23]  F. Wielgolaski,et al.  Phenological modifications in plants by various edaphic factors , 2001, International journal of biometeorology.

[24]  H. Tuomenvirta,et al.  Climate change projections for Finland during the 21st century , 2004 .

[25]  R. Ahas,et al.  Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere , 2006 .

[26]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[27]  Risto Sarvas,et al.  Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees. Active period. , 1972 .

[28]  Barrie Maxwell,et al.  2 – Arctic Climate: Potential for Change under Global Warming , 1992 .

[29]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Bayesian analysis of climate change impacts in phenology , 2004 .

[30]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[31]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[32]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[33]  Jouni Karhu,et al.  Development of a plant-phenological observation network in Finland. , 1996 .

[34]  Acia Arctic Climate Impact Assessment - ACIA , 2005 .

[35]  T. Rötzer,et al.  Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe , 2001 .

[36]  A. Menzel,et al.  Trends in phenological phases in Europe between 1951 and 1996 , 2000, International journal of biometeorology.

[37]  J. Schaber,et al.  Responses of spring phenology to climate change , 2004 .