Part C Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers: Percentage Eligible Versus Served

OBJECTIVE: Part C early intervention is a nationwide program that serves infants and toddlers who have developmental delays. Previous research has revealed that large numbers of candidates for Part C services do not receive early intervention. Current eligibility criteria for Part C services vary from state to state. This article compares estimates of the percentage of children who are likely to be eligible for early intervention in each state and Washington, DC, with the proportion of children who are served in each of those jurisdictions. METHODS: Data for this study were obtained from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey–Birth Cohort. Using these data, we computed the proportion of children who would be eligible based on the numerical eligibility definitions currently in use across the United States. RESULTS: This study revealed the proportion of infants and toddlers likely to be eligible for Part C services ranges from 2% to 78% across the United States. The proportion of children enrolled in Part C ranges from 1.48% to 6.96%. CONCLUSIONS: This research documented substantial variability in the proportion of children who are likely to be eligible for Part C services. Most states have adopted eligibility definitions that make many more children candidates for Part C early intervention than they serve. However, current rates of enrollment are insufficient to serve all children with delays that fall under 2 SDs below the mean on any of the 5 developmental domains that are required to be evaluated by Part C regulations.

[1]  D. Bailey,et al.  Service Provider Combinations and the Delivery of Early Intervention Services to Children and Families , 2010 .

[2]  N. Bayley.  Bayley Scales of Infant Development , 1999 .

[3]  M. Ganz,et al.  The Effect of State Early Intervention Eligibility Policy on Participation Among a Cohort of Young CSHCN , 2009, Pediatrics.

[4]  C. J. Wang,et al.  Factors influencing the enrollment of eligible extremely-low-birth-weight children in the part C early intervention program. , 2009, Academic pediatrics.

[5]  Cordelia Robinson,et al.  Prevalence of Developmental Delays and Participation in Early Intervention Services for Young Children , 2008, Pediatrics.

[6]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Does the persistence of development delay predict receipt of early intervention services? , 2012, Academic pediatrics.

[7]  Radu Lazar,et al.  Computing Theoretical Rates of Part C Eligibility Based on Developmental Delays , 2013, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[8]  Jo Shackelford.  State and Jurisdictional Eligibility Definitions for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Under IDEA , 2004 .

[9]  C. Hill.  National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center , 2002 .

[10]  J. Gould,et al.  Missed Opportunities in the Referral of High-Risk Infants to Early Intervention , 2012, Pediatrics.

[11]  A. Genz.  Numerical Computation of Multivariate Normal Probabilities , 1992 .

[12]  Jon Kolko,et al.  On education , 2010, INTR.

[13]  B. Chan,et al.  Issues of Part H Program Access in Minnesota , 1999 .

[14]  A. Carle,et al.  Effectiveness of part C early intervention physical, occupational, and speech therapy services for preterm or low birth weight infants in Wisconsin, United States. , 2012, Academic pediatrics.

[15]  Pub. Date.  of Education, Office of Special Education , 1998 .

[16]  S. Zeitlin,et al.  Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers , 1986 .

[17]  Susan Mrazek,et al.  The Cost of Serving Infants and Toddlers Under Part C , 2011 .

[18]  J. Chambers,et al.  Expenditures for Early Intervention Services , 2009 .

[19]  L. Andersson.  Appropriate and Inappropriate Interpretation and Use of Test Scores in Early Intervention , 2004 .

[20]  B. Vohr,et al.  Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993-1994. , 2000, Pediatrics.