Sensitivity analysis of model output: variance-based methods make the difference

There are many different ways to perform sensitivity analyses in answering these questions but they may not yield identical results. In this paper we will be concentrating on item (a) above. Many authors, when referring to the degree to which an input parameter affects the model output, use the terms ‘sensitive’, ‘important’, ‘most influential’, etc. The methods that will be discussed and used to perform SA in this paper are called ‘Variancebased methods’, in that the variability, or uncertainty, associated with an important input parameter is propagated through the model resulting in a large contribution to the overall output variability. Methods such as “importance measure” (Iman and Hora 1990, Saltelli et al. 1993, Homma and Saltelli 1996), or “correlation ratio” (Krzykacz 1990, McKay 1996), are capable of estimating the “main effect” contribution of each parameter to the output variance. However, whether a parameter is influential or not depends also on the interactions and influences of all the parameters. Derived from quite a ABSTRACT

[1]  M. Kendall,et al.  Kendall's advanced theory of statistics , 1995 .

[2]  I. M. Soboĺ Quasi-Monte Carlo methods , 1990 .

[3]  K. Shuler,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. III. Analysis of the approximations , 1975 .

[4]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[5]  K. Shuler,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. II Applications , 1973 .

[6]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical ExperienceSensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical Experience , 1995 .

[7]  A. Saltelli,et al.  An alternative way to compute Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) , 1998 .

[8]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[9]  Michael D. McKay,et al.  Evaluating Prediction Uncertainty , 1995 .

[10]  S. Hora,et al.  A Robust Measure of Uncertainty Importance for Use in Fault Tree System Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  K. Shuler,et al.  Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems , 1977 .

[12]  I. Sobol,et al.  About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output , 1995 .

[13]  McKay,et al.  A procedure for assessing uncertainty in models , 1993 .

[14]  T. Ishigami,et al.  An importance quantification technique in uncertainty analysis for computer models , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. First International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis.

[15]  Terry Andres,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of model output: an investigation of new techniques , 1993 .

[16]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[17]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[18]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of model output. Performance of the iterated fractional factorial design method , 1995 .

[19]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Comparison of Maximus/Bounding and Bayes/Monte Carlo for fault tree uncertainty analysis , 1986 .

[20]  Maurice G. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .