Pattern Formation and the Spatial Scale of Interaction between Predators and Their Prey.

We study interactions of predators and prey that are characterized by a scale difference in their use of space. Prey are assumed to occupy patches, forming a metapopulation with low migration among patches. Predators are homogeneously distributed over these patches, due to broad-scale foraging behavior or long-range juvenile dispersal. The predator population thus exerts a globally uniform predation pressure on the prey subpopulations. Under these conditions a nonlinear predator functional response depending on local prey density leads to multiple equilibria that can occur for the same parameter values. These equilibria differ in the fraction of prey patches that are (nearly) empty. Equilibria with a larger fraction of empty prey patches are more stable. The system tends to approach equilibria with a sufficiently high number of empty prey patches, so that local and global population dynamics are stable. If unstable dynamics are observed at all, the fluctuations in local prey density exhibit predictable characteristics. Our main conclusion is that a nonlinear functional response of the predator to local prey density can induce the formation of static patterns in prey density and, hence, lead to stable local and global dynamics. It is shown that these results are sufficiently general to carry over to situations in which prey migration between patches does occur or the spatial domain occupied by the prey population is continuous instead of subdivided into patches. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

[1]  M. Rosenzweig Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[2]  D. Padilla,et al.  Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns , 1987 .

[3]  William Gurney,et al.  Two-patch metapopulation dynamics , 1993 .

[4]  W. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of age-structured predatory-prey populations in space: asymmetical effects of mobility in juvenile and adult predators. , 1996 .

[5]  Vincent A. A. Jansen,et al.  Regulation of predator-prey systems through spatial interactions:a possible solution to the paradox of enrichment. , 1995 .

[6]  David A. Rand,et al.  Invasion, stability and evolution to criticality in spatially extended, artificial host—pathogen ecologies , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  W. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of Age-Structured and Spatially Structured Predator-Prey Interactions: Individual-Based Models and Population-Level Formulations , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[8]  W. Wilson,et al.  Spatial Instabilities within the Diffusive Lotka-Volterra System: Individual-Based Simulation Results , 1993 .

[9]  Jan Lindström,et al.  Synchrony in Tetraonid Population Dynamics , 1995 .

[10]  Effect of dimensionality on lotka-volterra predator-prey dynamics: Individual based simulation results , 1995 .

[11]  R. Zwanzig,et al.  Selected topics in statistical mechanics , 1968 .

[12]  D. Rand Measuring and characterizing spatial patterns, dynamics and chaos in spatially extended dynamical systems and ecologies , 1994, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Rolf A. Ims,et al.  geographical synchrony in microtine population cycles: a theoretical evaluation of the role of nomadic avian predators , 1990 .

[14]  G D Ruxton,et al.  Spatial self-organisation in ecology: pretty patterns or robust reality? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Ramón Margalef Perspectives in Ecological Theory , 1968 .

[16]  Johan A. J. Metz,et al.  A size dependent predator-prey interaction: who pursues whom? , 1990 .

[17]  Y. Kuznetsov,et al.  Continuation techniques and interactive software for bifurcation analysis of ODEs and iterated maps: physics , 1993 .

[18]  E. Korpimäki,et al.  Numerical and Functional Responses of Kestrels, Short‐Eared Owls, and Long‐Eared Owls to Vole Densities , 1991 .

[19]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[20]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Specialist predators, generalist predators, and the microtine rodent cycle. , 1991 .

[21]  Robert M. May,et al.  The spatial dynamics of host-parasitoid systems , 1992 .

[22]  William G. Wilson,et al.  Mobility versus density-limited predator-prey dynamics on different spatial scales , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  J. L. Jackson,et al.  Dissipative structure: an explanation and an ecological example. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  R. May,et al.  Metapopulations and equilibrium stability: the effects of spatial structure. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  A. Turing The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[26]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Predation across spatial scales in heterogeneous environments , 1992 .

[27]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics , 1991, Nature.