Increasing the delivery of next generation therapeutics from high throughput screening libraries.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mark J Wigglesworth | David C Murray | Carolyn J Blackett | Michael Kossenjans | J Willem M Nissink | Michael Kossenjans | Mark J Wigglesworth | David C Murray | Carolyn J Blackett | J Willem M Nissink
[1] Juan J. Marugan,et al. A High Throughput Screening Assay System for the Identification of Small Molecule Inhibitors of gsp , 2014, PloS one.
[2] J. Baell,et al. Chemistry: Chemical con artists foil drug discovery , 2014, Nature.
[3] Jayme L. Dahlin,et al. PAINS in the Assay: Chemical Mechanisms of Assay Interference and Promiscuous Enzymatic Inhibition Observed during a Sulfhydryl-Scavenging HTS , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[4] James Inglese,et al. Apparent activity in high-throughput screening: origins of compound-dependent assay interference. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[5] Kevin R Clark,et al. Small-Molecule Library Subset Screening as an Aid for Accelerating Lead Identification , 2014, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[6] E. Jacoby,et al. Theoretical and Experimental Relationships between Percent Inhibition and IC50 Data Observed in High-Throughput Screening , 2013, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[7] Stephan C Schürer,et al. Using the BioAssay Ontology for Analyzing High-Throughput Screening Data , 2015, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[8] Christopher P Austin,et al. A high-throughput screen for aggregation-based inhibition in a large compound library. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[9] MobergAndreas,et al. Assessing HTS performance using BioAssay Ontology: screening and analysis of a bacterial phospho-N-acetylmuramoyl-pentapeptide translocase campaign. , 2014 .
[10] Andrew L Hopkins,et al. The Joint European Compound Library: boosting precompetitive research. , 2015, Drug discovery today.
[11] F. Lombardo,et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .
[12] Kristian Kaufmann,et al. Discovery and SAR of a novel series of GIRK1/2 and GIRK1/4 activators. , 2013, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[13] P. Leeson,et al. The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[14] David R Spring,et al. Rational methods for the selection of diverse screening compounds. , 2011, ACS chemical biology.
[15] M. Pangalos,et al. Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca's drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework , 2014, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[16] Yunxiang Mu,et al. Identification of a fragment-like small molecule ligand for the methyl-lysine binding protein, 53BP1. , 2015, ACS chemical biology.
[17] David J Diller,et al. Deriving knowledge through data mining high-throughput screening data. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[18] Andrew Bell,et al. Shaping a Screening File for Maximal Lead Discovery Efficiency and Effectiveness: Elimination of Molecular Redundancy , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[19] D. Bojanic,et al. Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[20] Jayme L. Dahlin,et al. The essential roles of chemistry in high-throughput screening triage. , 2014, Future medicinal chemistry.
[21] Anne Mai Wassermann,et al. Efficient search of chemical space: navigating from fragments to structurally diverse chemotypes. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[22] J Willem M Nissink,et al. Quantification of frequent-hitter behavior based on historical high-throughput screening data. , 2014, Future medicinal chemistry.
[23] Dario Neri,et al. 20 years of DNA-encoded chemical libraries. , 2011, Chemical communications.
[24] Mohane Selvaraj Coumar,et al. Identification of ligand efficient, fragment-like hits from an HTS library: structure-based virtual screening and docking investigations of 2H- and 3H-pyrazolo tautomers for Aurora kinase A selectivity , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[25] Olivier Sperandio,et al. Ligand efficiency driven design of new inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcriptional repressor EthR using fragment growing, merging, and linking approaches. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[26] Christopher W Murray,et al. Efficient exploration of chemical space by fragment-based screening. , 2014, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.
[27] J. Medina-Franco,et al. Expanding the medicinally relevant chemical space with compound libraries. , 2012, Drug discovery today.
[28] James Inglese,et al. Innovation in academic chemical screening: filling the gaps in chemical biology. , 2013, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[29] Asher Mullard,et al. European Lead Factory opens for business , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[30] Monya Baker,et al. Fragment-based lead discovery grows up , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[31] Chris Abell,et al. A three-stage biophysical screening cascade for fragment-based drug discovery , 2013, Nature Protocols.
[32] Anne Mai Wassermann,et al. Large Scale Meta-Analysis of Fragment-Based Screening Campaigns , 2015, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[33] Stephen Gabriel,et al. Metal impurities cause false positives in high-throughput screening campaigns. , 2013, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[34] Stefan Schmitt,et al. Stratified High-Throughput Screening Sets Enable Flexible Screening Strategies from a Single Plated Collection , 2014, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[35] Karina Martinez-Mayorga,et al. Balancing novelty with confined chemical space in modern drug discovery , 2014, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[36] D. Swinney,et al. The Contribution of Mechanistic Understanding to Phenotypic Screening for First-in-Class Medicines , 2013, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[37] Igor V. Tetko,et al. Identification of Small-Molecule Frequent Hitters from AlphaScreen High-Throughput Screens , 2014, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[38] Darren V S Green,et al. Getting physical in drug discovery II: the impact of chromatographic hydrophobicity measurements and aromaticity. , 2011, Drug discovery today.
[39] M. Edwards,et al. Using the Golden Triangle to optimize clearance and oral absorption. , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[40] Thierry Kogej,et al. Big pharma screening collections: more of the same or unique libraries? The AstraZeneca-Bayer Pharma AG case. , 2013, Drug discovery today.
[41] Thierry Kogej,et al. Physicochemical property profiles of marketed drugs, clinical candidates and bioactive compounds. , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[42] Dario Neri,et al. DNA-encoded chemical libraries: advancing beyond conventional small-molecule libraries. , 2014, Accounts of Chemical Research.
[43] Christopher W Murray,et al. Experiences in fragment-based drug discovery. , 2012, Trends in pharmacological sciences.
[44] Thomas J. Crisman,et al. Which aspects of HTS are empirically correlated with downstream success? , 2008, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.