Effects of contact cap dimension on dry adhesion of bioinspired mushroom-shaped surfaces

Dry adhesion observed in small creatures, such as spiders, insects, and geckos, has many great advantages such as repeatability and strong adhesiveness. In order to mimic these unique performances, fibrillar surface with a mushroom shaped end has drawn lots of attentions because of its advantage in efficiently enhancing adhesion compared with other sphere or simple flat ends. Here, in order to study the effects of contact cap dimension on adhesion strength, patterned surfaces of mushroom-shaped micropillars with differing cap diameters are fabricated based on the conventional photolithography and molding. The normal adhesion strength of these dry adhesives with varying cap diameters is measured with home-built equipment. The strength increases with the rise of cap diameter, and interestingly it becomes strongest when the mushroom caps join together.

[1]  G. Carbone,et al.  Sticky bio-inspired micropillars: finding the best shape. , 2012, Small.

[2]  Carlo Menon,et al.  A low-cost, high-yield fabrication method for producing optimized biomimetic dry adhesives , 2009 .

[3]  Kahp Y. Suh,et al.  Nanohairs and nanotubes: Efficient structural elements for gecko-inspired artificial dry adhesives , 2009 .

[4]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[5]  K. Autumn,et al.  Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[6]  Kahp Y. Suh,et al.  Nano meets beetles from wing to tiptoe: Versatile tools for smart and reversible adhesions , 2012 .

[7]  Yu Tian,et al.  Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  M. Sitti,et al.  The optimal shape of elastomer mushroom-like fibers for high and robust adhesion , 2014, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[9]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  Yucheng Ding,et al.  Fabrication of well-defined mushroom-shaped structures for biomimetic dry adhesive by conventional photolithography and molding. , 2014, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[11]  Giuseppe Carbone,et al.  Origin of the superior adhesive performance of mushroom-shaped microstructured surfaces , 2011 .

[12]  Lars Heepe,et al.  Adhesion failure at 180,000 frames per second: direct observation of the detachment process of a mushroom-shaped adhesive. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[13]  Ming Zhou,et al.  Controllable interfacial adhesion applied to transfer light and fragile objects by using gecko inspired mushroom-shaped pillar surface. , 2013, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[14]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[15]  K. Suh,et al.  A nontransferring dry adhesive with hierarchical polymer nanohairs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Carlo Menon,et al.  Deep UV patterning of acrylic masters for molding biomimetic dry adhesives , 2010 .

[17]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Tian Tang,et al.  Can a fibrillar interface be stronger and tougher than a non-fibrillar one? , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.