The role of characteristic motion in object categorization.

We report three experiments where we investigated the role of movement in object recognition. Previous studies have suggested a distinct and separate mechanism for object motion encoding, related to the action or motor-based system. To date, however, the role of an object's motion in long-term memory representations has not been explicitly tested. Here we were specifically interested in whether an object's characteristic motion patterns are integrated with static properties in an object's representation in memory. To that end, we used a simple categorization task where novel objects were categorized on the basis of two static (color and shape) and two dynamic (action and path) properties. The "action" of an object referred to its intrinsic motion pattern, whereas "path" referred to an object's extrinsic motion pattern (i.e., the route an object took). In Experiment 1, we found that all properties were relevant for categorization with the exception of path. This result was not due to path being less salient than other properties (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, we found that when the action property was redundant that path was now used for categorization, suggesting that path was not used with action in Experiment 1 because of temporal order effects. Our findings argue for a cue-integrated model of object representation in memory.

[1]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988 .

[2]  Benise S. K Mak,et al.  The role of motion in children's categorization of objects , 1999, Cognition.

[3]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Haxby,et al.  Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  J. N. Bassili Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  R. Weale Analysis of Visual Behaviour , 1983 .

[8]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[11]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[12]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  A. Johnston,et al.  Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces , 2001, Current Biology.

[14]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Visual representation of malleable and rigid objects that deform as they rotate. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Effects of temporal association on recognition memory , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[17]  M. Lappe,et al.  Measurement of generalization fields for the recognition of biological motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Hummel Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition , 2001 .

[19]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Development of face processing: the effect of face inversion. , 2000, Child development.

[20]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity , 2003, Vision Research.

[21]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representation and recognition in vision , 1999 .

[23]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[24]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[25]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesis , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  L J Bernstein,et al.  Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Alan W. Kersten,et al.  A DIVISION OF LABOR BETWEEN NOUNS AND VERBS IN THE REPRESENTATION OF MOTION , 1998 .

[28]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Akichika Mikami,et al.  Visual responses in the temporal cortex to moving objects with invariant contours , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  G W Humphreys,et al.  View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  S. Zeki,et al.  Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. , 1971, Brain research.

[32]  J. Aloimonos,et al.  On the kinetic depth effect , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  H. Evans The Study of Instinct , 1952 .

[34]  Alan W. Kersten,et al.  An examination of the distinction between nouns and verbs: Associations with two different kinds of motion , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[35]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Recognizing Famous Faces: Exploring the Benefits of Facial Motion , 2000 .

[37]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Dynamic properties influence the perception of facial , 2001 .

[38]  J E Cutting,et al.  A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Distinct mechanisms for the representation of moving and static objects , 2002 .

[40]  James V. Stone,et al.  Object recognition: view-specificity and motion-specificity , 1999, Vision Research.

[41]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[42]  V. Bruce,et al.  The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[43]  William Rowan,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[44]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  S. Edelman,et al.  Canonical views in object representation and recognition , 1994, Vision Research.

[46]  V. Bruce,et al.  The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[47]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[48]  G. Pike,et al.  Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. , 1997 .

[49]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  G. Wallis The role of object motion in forging long-term representations of objects , 2002 .

[51]  Michael J. Tarr Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .

[52]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[53]  James V. Stone Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures , 1998, Vision Research.

[54]  D. Perrett,et al.  Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  J M Findlay,et al.  The Effect of Depth Rotation on Object Identification , 1997, Perception.

[56]  D. Massaro,et al.  Perceiving Talking Faces , 1995 .