The Effects of Catalyst Layer Deposition Methodology on Electrode Performance

The catalyst layer of the cathode is arguably the most critical component of low-temperature fuel cells and carbon dioxide (CO2) electrolysis cells because their performance is typically limited by slow oxygen (O2) and CO2 reduction kinetics. While significant efforts have focused on developing cathode catalysts with improved activity and stability, fewer efforts have focused on engineering the catalyst layer structure to maximize catalyst utilization and overall electrode and system performance. Here, we study the performance of cathodes for O2 reduction and CO2 reduction as a function of three common catalyst layer preparation methods: hand-painting, air-brushing, and screen-printing. We employed ex-situ X-ray micro-computed tomography (MicroCT) to visualize the catalyst layer structure and established data processing procedures to quantify catalyst uniformity. By coupling structural analysis with in-situ electrochemical characterization, we directly correlate variation in catalyst layer morphology to electrode performance. MicroCT and SEM analyses indicate that, as expected, more uniform catalyst distribution and less particle agglomeration, lead to better performance. Most importantly, the analyses reported here allow for the observed differences over a large geometric volume as a function of preparation methods to be quantified and explained for the first time. Depositing catalyst layers via a fully-automated air-brushing method led to a 56% improvement in fuel cell performance and a significant reduction in electrode-to-electrode variability. Furthermore, air-brushing catalyst layers for CO2 reduction led to a 3-fold increase in partial CO current density and enhanced product selectivity (94% CO) at similar cathode potential but a 10-fold decrease in catalyst loading as compared to previous reports.

[1]  S. Hwang,et al.  Fabrication and evaluation of membrane electrode assemblies by low-temperature decal methods for direct methanol fuel cells , 2009 .

[2]  Rui Chen,et al.  Influence of threshold variation on determining the properties of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell gas diffusion layer in X-ray nano-tomography , 2010 .

[3]  F. Prinz,et al.  A sharp peak in the performance of sputtered platinum fuel cells at ultra-low platinum loading , 2002 .

[4]  Won-Yong Lee,et al.  Effect of pore structure of catalyst layer in a PEMFC on its performance , 2003 .

[5]  Sanjeev Mukerjee,et al.  High performance polymer electrolyte fuel cells with ultra-low Pt loading electrodes prepared by dual ion-beam assisted deposition , 2006 .

[6]  Darren M. Stevenson,et al.  Combining Structural and Electrochemical Analysis of Electrodes Using Micro-Computed Tomography and a Microfluidic Fuel Cell , 2012 .

[7]  Aimy Bazylak,et al.  Liquid water visualization in PEM fuel cells: A review , 2009 .

[8]  Mark F. Mathias,et al.  Electrochemistry and the Future of the Automobile , 2010 .

[9]  R. Zengerle,et al.  Direct three-dimensional reconstruction of a nanoporous catalyst layer for a polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2011 .

[10]  P. Kenis,et al.  Prospects of CO2 Utilization via Direct Heterogeneous Electrochemical Reduction , 2010 .

[11]  F. Marone,et al.  Determination of Material Properties of Gas Diffusion Layers: Experiments and Simulations Using Phase Contrast Tomographic Microscopy , 2009 .

[12]  Bruno G. Pollet,et al.  The effect of materials on proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrode performance , 2011 .

[13]  M. Linardi,et al.  Effects of membrane electrode assembly preparation on the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance , 2004 .

[14]  K. S. Dhathathreyan,et al.  Catalyst layer in PEMFC electrodes—Fabrication, characterisation and analysis , 2007 .

[15]  S. Litster,et al.  Resolving the Three‐Dimensional Microstructure of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Electrodes using Nanometer‐Scale X‐ray Computed Tomography , 2012 .

[16]  Fikile R. Brushett,et al.  Alkaline Microfluidic Hydrogen-Oxygen Fuel Cell as a Cathode Characterization Platform , 2009 .

[17]  H. Gasteiger,et al.  Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs , 2005 .

[18]  Babar M. Koraishy,et al.  Manufacturing of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Electrodes by Spraying , 2010, ECS Transactions.

[19]  Devin T. Whipple Microfluidic reactor for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide , 2010 .

[20]  John Newman,et al.  Design of an Electrochemical Cell Making Syngas ( CO + H2 ) from CO2 and H2O Reduction at Room Temperature , 2007 .

[21]  Yongchai Kwon,et al.  Comparative study of three different catalyst coating methods for direct methanol fuel cells , 2010 .

[22]  Aimy Bazylak,et al.  Unstructured Pore Network Modeling with Heterogeneous PEMFC GDL Porosity Distributions , 2010 .

[23]  Ingo Manke,et al.  3D Imaging of Catalyst Support Corrosion in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2011 .

[24]  Bruno G. Pollet,et al.  A novel method for preparing proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrodes by the ultrasonic-spray technique , 2011 .

[25]  Leilei Yin,et al.  Analysis of Pt/C electrode performance in a flowing-electrolyte alkaline fuel cell , 2012 .

[26]  Fumitake Yoshida,et al.  Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous electrolyte solutions , 1979 .

[27]  Eric J. Dufek,et al.  Bench-scale electrochemical system for generation of CO and syn-gas , 2011 .

[28]  Eric J. Dufek,et al.  Influence of S Contamination on CO2 Reduction at Ag Electrodes , 2011 .

[29]  Branko N. Popov,et al.  Preparation of PEM fuel cell electrodes using pulse electrodeposition , 2004 .

[30]  Mark K. Debe,et al.  Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells , 2012, Nature.

[31]  H. Yano,et al.  Electrochemical reduction of CO2 at three-phase (gas ∣ liquid ∣ solid) and two-phase (liquid ∣ solid) interfaces on Ag electrodes , 2002 .

[32]  Jon M. Hiller,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of a solid-oxide fuel-cell anode , 2006, Nature materials.

[33]  Toshio Tsukamoto,et al.  Electrocatalytic process of CO selectivity in electrochemical reduction of CO2 at metal electrodes in aqueous media , 1994 .

[34]  I. Manke,et al.  3D Visualisation of PEMFC Electrode Structures Using FIB Nanotomography , 2010 .

[35]  C. Roth,et al.  Structured multilayered electrodes of proton/electron conducting polymer for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells assembled by spray coating , 2010 .

[36]  Roland Zengerle,et al.  Nano-morphology of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell catalyst layer—imaging, reconstruction and analysis , 2011 .

[37]  Rui Chen,et al.  3D reconstruction of a gas diffusion layer and a microporous layer , 2010 .

[38]  Z. Fishman,et al.  Microscale Tomography Investigations of Heterogeneous Porosity Distributions of PEMFC GDLs , 2010 .

[39]  J. Jorné,et al.  Study of the Exchange Current Density for the Hydrogen Oxidation and Evolution Reactions , 2007 .

[40]  Sung-Chul Yi,et al.  Optimal catalyst layer structure of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell , 2011 .

[41]  P. Kenis,et al.  Investigation of Pt, Pt3Co , and Pt3Co / Mo Cathodes for the ORR in a Microfluidic H2 / O2 Fuel Cell , 2010 .