Calculation and experimental determination of the structure transfer accuracy in deep x-ray lithography

Deep x-ray lithography with synchrotron radiation is the key microfabrication process in the LIGA technology. Micro-components with a height of some up to several mm can be manufactured with sub- precision. The pattern transfer accuracy is governed by technological constraints like thermal deformation of the mask as well as by various physical effects, e.g. diffraction, emission of photo- and Auger electrons, fluorescence radiation, radiation scattering and divergence of the synchrotron radiation beam. A computer program has been developed to investigate the significance of these effects to the dose distribution in the resist material, which in turn determines the lateral structure resolution and the quality of the resist structures. In this paper the models used for the calculation and the calculation procedure are introduced and the weight of the different contributions with respect to transfer accuracy is investigated. It is shown that beam divergence and diffraction are much less important than the image blur caused by photoelectrons. Fluorescence radiation emitted from the mask membrane or the substrate contributes to the dose deposition in the resist if mask membrane or substrate consists of high-atomic-number material. Scattering of radiation is negligible for resist layers which are less than some mm thick. The calculations are compared with measurement results for different substrate materials, synchrotron radiation sources and resist heights. A good agreement was found between calculated dose distributions and measured resist side wall profiles. This allows a partial compensation of the above-mentioned accuracy limiting effects early in the mask design phase.

[1]  W. Ehrfeld,et al.  Deep X-ray lithography for the production of three-dimensional microstructures from metals, polymers and ceramics , 1995 .

[2]  W. Ehrfeld,et al.  Three-dimensional microfabrication using synchrotron radiation , 1991 .

[3]  F. Pantenburg,et al.  Influence of secondary effects on the structure quality in deep X-ray lithography , 1995 .

[4]  A. Heuberger,et al.  Computer simulations of resist profiles in x‐ray lithography , 1981 .

[5]  Andreas Schmidt,et al.  Thermoelastic deformations of masks for deep X-ray lithography , 1995 .

[6]  M. Feldman,et al.  Resolution limits in x‐ray lithography , 1992 .

[7]  M. Kotera,et al.  Monte Carlo modeling of the photo and Auger electron production in X-ray lithography with synchrotron radiation , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[8]  Kenji Murata,et al.  Monte Carlo Calculations on Electron Scattering in a Solid Target , 1971 .

[9]  A. Heuberger,et al.  Resolution limits in x‐ray lithography calculated by means of x‐ray lithography simulator XMAS , 1986 .

[10]  W. Ehrfeld,et al.  Investigation of the adhesive strength of PMMA structures on substrates obtained by deep X-ray lithography , 1996 .

[11]  T. J. Tanaka,et al.  Low-energy x-ray interaction coefficients: Photoabsorption, scattering, and reflection: E = 100–2000 eV Z = 1–94☆ , 1982 .

[12]  David B. Wittry,et al.  X-ray continuum from thick elemental targets for 10-50-keV electrons , 1974 .

[13]  A. E. Grün,et al.  Lumineszenz-photometrische Messungen der Energieabsorption im Strahlungsfeld von Elektronenquellen Eindimensionaler Fall in Luft , 1957 .

[14]  S. Santangelo,et al.  Monte Carlo modelling of electron beam lithography: a scaling law , 1994 .

[15]  W. Veigele,et al.  Photon cross sections from 0.1 keV to 1 MeV for elements Z = 1 to Z = 94* , 1973 .