Promoting quality for teacher action research: lessons learned from science teachers’ action research

In this article we explore the concept of quality in teacher action research by re‐examining our participation with science teachers in several different collaborative action research projects. We conducted second‐order action research and generated a series reflexive conditions for promoting and ensuring quality action research. We assert that a collaborative action research group must function as both a community of practice and an epistemic community if both practice is to be improved and knowledge and understanding is to be generated. In addition, teacher researchers must have a thorough grounding of the nature of action research and knowledge of appropriate research methods. The framework we have outlined only goes as far as suggesting a possible set of guidelines or conditions, and is not intended to be prescriptive. For others researchers, teacher educators and practitioners, this framework may serve as a starting point to draw from when establishing and facilitating their own action research projects.

[1]  P. Reason.  Choice and Quality in Action Research Practice , 2006 .

[2]  Peter N. Posch,et al.  Teachers investigate their work : an introduction to the methods of action research , 1993 .

[3]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Existential approaches to action research , 2002 .

[4]  J. H. McMillan.  Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research , 2001 .

[5]  John Elliott,et al.  Action research for educational change , 1991 .

[6]  V. Timmons.  Shaping A Professional Identity: Stories of Educational Practice , 2006 .

[7]  Y. Lincoln,et al.  Scientific Research in Education , 2004 .

[8]  J. Minstrell,et al.  Action Research as a Research Methodology for the Study of the Teaching and Learning of Science. , 2000 .

[9]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research , 1996 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[11]  Nicholas M. Allix.  Book Review: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 2000 .

[12]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  Building a Professional Culture in Schools. , 1988 .

[13]  Corrine Glesne,et al.  Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction , 1991 .

[14]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[15]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[16]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[17]  Uwe Flick,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[18]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Examining the Experiences of Three Generations of Teacher Researchers through Collaborative Science Teacher Inquiry. , 2006 .

[19]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  Exploring the Labyrinth of First and Second Order Inquiry in Action Research , 1998 .

[20]  A. Feldman.  The Role of Conversation in Collaborative Action Research , 1999 .

[21]  Linda A. Catelli.  Action Research and Collaborative Inquiry in a School-University Partnership , 1995 .

[22]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Science teachers' attempts at integrating feminist pedagogy through collaborative action research , 2007 .

[23]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Episteme or practice? Differentiated communitarian structures in a biology laboratory , 2003 .

[24]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[25]  F. Michael Connelly,et al.  Shaping a Professional Identity: Stories of Educational Practice , 1999 .

[26]  H. Altrichter.  The role of the ‘professional community’ in action research , 2005 .

[27]  Emily F. Calhoun.  How to Use Action Research in the Self-Renewing School , 1994 .

[28]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Erzberger's dilemma: Validity in action research and science teachers' need to know , 1994 .

[29]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[30]  Jacqueline K. Peck,et al.  No Child Left Behind , 2005 .

[31]  A. Feldman,et al.  Orientations, purposes and reflection: a framework for understanding action research , 1999 .

[32]  L. Stenhouse.  An introduction to curriculum research and development , 1975 .

[33]  A. Erzberger,et al.  A framework for physics projects , 1996 .

[34]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Promoting equitable collaboration between university researchers and school teachers , 1993 .