Learning face-name associations and the effect of age and performance: a PET activation study

Learning face-name associations is a complex task to be mastered in every day life that approaches the limits of cognitive capacity in most normal humans. We studied brain activation during face-name learning using positron emission tomography (PET) in 11 normal volunteers. The most intense activation was seen in occipital association cortex (BA 18) bilaterally, also involving lingual and fusiform gyrus (BA 37). In the left hemisphere additional activation were located in inferior temporal gyrus, the inferior part of pre- and postcentral gyrus, and orbitofrontal cortex (BA 11), whereas in the right hemisphere only a region in the precuneus (BA 19) was activated additionally. There was considerable interindividual variation of encoding success, which was significantly related to activation of BA 18 bilaterally. Subject ages covered a range of 26-72 years, but - in contrast to the effect of encoding success - there was no significant age effect on activations. Task-independent habituation effects were seen in cerebellum and left middle temporal gyrus. These results indicate that the intensity of information processing in ventral occipital association cortex is most important for success of face-name encoding. Learning is further mediated by a predominantly left-hemispheric network including inferior temporal and orbitofrontal cortex.

[1]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Regional Cerebral Blood Flow during Working Memory for Faces , 1998, NeuroImage.

[2]  K Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT EXACT HR: Performance of a New High Resolution Positron Scanner , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[4]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Neural Systems Underlying the Recognition of Familiar and Newly Learned Faces , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  H. Müller-Gärtner,et al.  Encoding and retrieval in declarative learning: a positron emission tomography study , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  C J Price,et al.  The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  F. Aldrich,et al.  The Rivermead behavioural memory test for children (RBMT-C) , 1991 .

[9]  A R McIntosh,et al.  Frontotemporal interactions in face encoding and recognition. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  F. Craik,et al.  Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Prof. Dr. Heiko Braak,et al.  Architectonics of the Human Telencephalic Cortex , 1980, Studies of Brain Function.

[14]  Robert A. Bornstein,et al.  The Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised , 1990 .

[15]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Direct comparison of the neural substrates of recognition memory for words and faces. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  J. Pardo,et al.  The Role of the Fusiform Gyrus in Successful Encoding of Face Stimuli , 1999, NeuroImage.

[17]  Richard D. Hichwa,et al.  A neural basis for lexical retrieval , 1996, Nature.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Age-related reductions in human recognition memory due to impaired encoding. , 1995, Science.

[19]  Mitsuru Kawamura,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Clinical and Anatomical Study of Four Patients , 1995, Cortex.

[20]  W. Sommer,et al.  Differential localization of brain systems subserving memory for names and faces in normal subjects with event-related potentials. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  T G Turkington,et al.  Adult age differences in the functional neuroanatomy of verbal recognition memory , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[22]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  D Comar,et al.  Regional Cerebral Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in Human Aging , 1984, Stroke.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[25]  E. Rolls,et al.  Face and voice expression identification in patients with emotional and behavioural changes following ventral frontal lobe damage , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Brain Imaging , 2003, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[27]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Involvement of the human cerebellum during habituation of the acoustic startle response: A PET study , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[28]  Cheryl L Grady,et al.  Changes in memory processing with age , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  K. Herholz,et al.  Impaired metabolic activation in Alzheimer's disease: A pet study during continuous visual recognition , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  J R Moeller,et al.  Individual differences in PET activation of object perception and attention systems predict face matching accuracy. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[31]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. II. Implementation and validation. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[33]  A. R. McIntosh,et al.  Recruitment of unique neural systems to support visual memory in normal aging , 1999, Current Biology.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  G. Dahl WIP, reduzierter Wechsler-Intelligenztest , 1972 .

[37]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  L. Deouell,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia , 1999 .

[39]  E. Tulving,et al.  Age‐related differences in effective neural connectivity during encoding and recall , 1997, Neuroreport.

[40]  D Y von Cramon,et al.  Retrieval of old memories: the temporofrontal hypothesis. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Face encoding and recognition in the human brain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation of Human Hippocampal Formation During Memory for Faces: A Pet Study , 1995, Cortex.

[43]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Automatic 3‐D model‐based neuroanatomical segmentation , 1995 .

[44]  L. Squire,et al.  The medial temporal lobe memory system , 1991, Science.

[45]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  R. Dolan,et al.  Neural Activation during Covert Processing of Positive Emotional Facial Expressions , 1996, NeuroImage.

[47]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  S E Petersen,et al.  The processing of single words studied with positron emission tomography. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[49]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[50]  E. Renzi,et al.  Prosopagnosia can be associated with damage confined to the right hemisphere—An MRI and PET study and a review of the literature , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  H. Duvernoy The Human Brain , 1999, Springer Vienna.

[52]  Peter La Cour,et al.  Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test , 1990 .

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Decreases in Regional Cerebral Blood Flow with Normal Aging , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[54]  J Sergent,et al.  Functional and anatomical decomposition of face processing: evidence from prosopagnosia and PET study of normal subjects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[55]  G A Orban,et al.  Regional brain activity during shape recognition impaired by a scopolamine challenge to encoding , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.