Nanohydroxyapatite/poly(ester urethane) scaffold for bone tissue engineering.

Biodegradable viscoelastic poly(ester urethane)-based scaffolds show great promise for tissue engineering. In this study, the preparation of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHA)/poly(ester urethane) composite scaffolds using a salt-leaching-phase inverse process is reported. The dispersion of nHA microaggregates in the polymer matrix were imaged by microcomputed X-ray tomography, allowing a study of the effect of the nHA mass fraction and process parameters on the inorganic phase dispersion, and ultimately the optimization of the preparation method. How the composite scaffold's geometry and mechanical properties change with the nHA mass fraction and the process parameters were assessed. Increasing the amount of nHA particles in the composite scaffold decreased the porosity, increased the wall thickness and consequently decreased the pore size. The Young's modulus of the poly(ester urethane) scaffold was improved by 50% by addition of 10 wt.% nHA (from 0.95+/-0.5 to 1.26+/-0.4 MPa), while conserving poly(ester urethane) viscoelastic properties and without significant changes in the scaffold macrostructure. Moreover, the process permitted the inclusion of nHA particles not only in the poly(ester urethane) matrix, but also at the surface of the scaffold pores, as shown by scanning electron microscopy. nHA/poly(ester urethane) composite scaffolds have great potential as osteoconductive constructs for bone tissue engineering.

[1]  B D Boyan,et al.  Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[2]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  In vitro degradation of novel medical biodegradable aliphatic polyurethanes based on ϵ-caprolactone and Pluronics® with various hydrophilicities , 2002 .

[3]  Mauro Alini,et al.  The use of biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering: potential and limitations. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[4]  T. Webster,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[5]  Darren J. Martin,et al.  Effect of the average soft-segment length on the morphology and properties of segmented polyurethane nanocomposites , 2006 .

[6]  J. Koberstein,et al.  Multiple melting in segmented polyurethane block copolymers , 1992 .

[7]  N. Hasırcı,et al.  Polyurethanes in biomedical applications. , 2004, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[8]  A. Mak,et al.  Hybrid coating of hydroxyapatite and collagen within poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffold. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[9]  Sylwester Gogolewski,et al.  Preparation, degradation, and calcification of biodegradable polyurethane foams for bone graft substitutes. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[10]  C. Plummer,et al.  Correlating the rheological and mechanical response of polyurethane nanocomposites containing hyperbranched polymers , 2005 .

[11]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Architecture and properties of anisotropic polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[12]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data from Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  P. Neuenschwander,et al.  Structural variants of biodegradable polyesterurethane in vivo evoke a cellular and angiogenic response that is dictated by architecture. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[14]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[15]  M. R. Pereira,et al.  Polymer–filler interactions and mechanical properties of a polyurethane elastomer , 2000 .

[16]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Structure-property relations and cytotoxicity of isosorbide-based biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[17]  Min Wang,et al.  Developing bioactive composite materials for tissue replacement. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[18]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Biodegradable porous polyurethane scaffolds for tissue repair and regeneration. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  Nitin Kumar,et al.  High-performance elastomeric nanocomposites via solvent-exchange processing. , 2007, Nature materials.

[20]  S. Guelcher,et al.  Biodegradable polyurethanes: synthesis and applications in regenerative medicine. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[21]  R. Legeros,et al.  Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  Katherine D Kavlock,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of segmented poly(esterurethane urea) elastomers for bone tissue engineering. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[23]  Junrong Zheng,et al.  Disruption of self-assembly and altered mechanical behavior in polyurethane/zinc oxide nanocomposites , 2005 .

[24]  P. Neuenschwander,et al.  Development of degradable polyesterurethanes for medical applications: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  Pol Maria Rommens,et al.  The effect of human osteoblasts on proliferation and neo-vessel formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells in a long-term 3D co-culture on polyurethane scaffolds. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[26]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-polyethylene composites for bone substitution: effects of ceramic particle size and morphology. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[27]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Biodegradable polyurethane cancellous bone graft substitutes in the treatment of iliac crest defects. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.