Text Presentation for Augmented Reality Applications in Dual-Task Situations

We investigate how reading text in augmented reality (AR) glasses and the simultaneous execution of three real-world tasks interfere with each other. The three tasks are a visual stimulus-response task (VSRT), a simple walking task and a walking obstacle course. Also, we investigate the effects of different AR text positions on primary task and reading performance as well as subjective preference. We propose a novel out of sight body-locked text placement for AR text presentation to be used in dual-task situations and compare it to head-locked text placement, each in two heights. AR reading affected performance in all tasks and reading speed was affected in all dual-task conditions. Participants subjectively preferred the body-locked text presentation, while objective measures do not reflect that preference. Differences between the tasks and several interaction effects between task and AR text placement demonstrate the necessity to carefully consider the context of use when designing AR reading UIs. The presented study with 12 participants provides insights into the effects of AR glasses usage in dual-task situations and several design recommendations are derived from the results.

[1]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  An evaluation of wearable information spaces , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[2]  R. F. Haines,et al.  Cognitive issues in head-up displays , 1980 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Head up Displays: An Attention Perspective and a Meta Analysis , 2000 .

[4]  James B. Sampson,et al.  Cognitive Performance of Individuals Using a Head—Mounted Display While Walking , 1993 .

[5]  Niels Henze,et al.  Reading on Smart Glasses: The Effect of Text Position, Presentation Type and Walking , 2018, CHI.

[6]  Antti Oulasvirta The fragmentation of attention in mobile interaction, and what to do with it , 2005, INTR.

[7]  Deborah Hix,et al.  The Effects of Text Drawing Styles, Background Textures, and Natural Lighting on Text Legibility in Outdoor Augmented Reality , 2006, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  Jerrold M. Levine,et al.  Measurement of Workload by Secondary Tasks , 1979 .

[9]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures , 2011, CHI.

[10]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Integrating Text with Video and 3D Graphics: The Effects of Text Drawing Styles on Text Readability , 2010, CHI.

[11]  Thomas Alexander,et al.  Optimal Font Size for Head-Mounted-Displays in Outdoor Applications , 2008, 2008 12th International Conference Information Visualisation.

[12]  D.P. Siewiorek,et al.  Wearable computers , 1994, IEEE Potentials.

[13]  T. Oberg,et al.  Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readibility of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  William S. Helton,et al.  Climbing With a Head-Mounted Display , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Kiyoshi Kiyokawa,et al.  Managing mobile text in head mounted displays: studies on visual preference and text placement , 2014, MOCO.

[17]  Takashi Kawai,et al.  Visual task performance using a monocular see-through head-mounted display (HMD) while walking. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[18]  Giuseppe Monno,et al.  Text Readability in Head-Worn Displays: Color and Style Optimization in Video versus Optical See-Through Devices , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.