US Norms for Six Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Indexes From the National Health Measurement Study

Background:A number of indexes measuring self-reported generic health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) using preference-weighted scoring are used widely in population surveys and clinical studies in the United States. Objective:To obtain age-by-gender norms for older adults on 6 generic HRQoL indexes in a cross-sectional US population survey and compare age-related trends in HRQoL. Methods:The EuroQol EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark 2, Health Utilities Index Mark 3, SF-36v2™ (used to compute SF-6D), Quality of Well-being Scale self-administered form, and Health and Activities Limitations index were administered via telephone interview to each respondent in a national survey sample of 3844 noninstitutionalized adults age 35–89. Persons age 65–89 and telephone exchanges with high percentages of African Americans were oversampled. Age-by-gender means were computed using sampling and poststratification weights to adjust results to the US adult population. Results:The 6 indexes exhibit similar patterns of age-related HRQoL by gender; however, means differ significantly across indexes. Females report slightly lower HRQoL than do males across all age groups. HRQoL seems somewhat higher for persons age 65–74 compared with people in the next younger age decade, as measured by all indexes. Conclusions:Six HRQoL measures show similar but not identical trends in population norms for older US adults. Results reported here provide reference values for 6 self-reported HRQoL indexes.

[1]  D L Patrick,et al.  Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. , 1973, Health services research.

[2]  J. Ware,et al.  Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[3]  R M Kaplan,et al.  A general health policy model: update and applications. , 1988, Health services research.

[4]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[5]  R. Klein,et al.  The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[7]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Identifying and Valuing Outcomes , 1996 .

[8]  Robert M. Kaplan,et al.  The quality of well-being scale: Comparison of the interviewer-administered version with a self-administered questionnaire , 1997 .

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. , 1998, Medical care.

[10]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 Health Survey Update , 2000, Spine.

[11]  D. Wagener,et al.  Summary measures of population health: methods for calculating healthy life expectancy. , 2001, Healthy People 2010 statistical notes : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics.

[12]  R. Rabin,et al.  EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[13]  M. Boyle,et al.  Multiattribute and Single‐Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System , 2002, Medical care.

[14]  D. Fryback,et al.  HALYS and QALYS and DALYS, Oh My: similarities and differences in summary measures of population Health. , 2002, Annual review of public health.

[15]  J. Brazier,et al.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[16]  Frank de Charro,et al.  The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective , 2003, Springer Netherlands.

[17]  Floyd J Fowler,et al.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. , 2004, JAMA.

[18]  P. Erickson,et al.  Evaluation of a population-based measure of quality of life: the Health and Activity Limitation Index (HALex) , 1998, Quality of Life Research.

[19]  J. Gentleman,et al.  Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health , 2004 .

[20]  Analysis of health-related quality of life (HRQL), its distribution, and its distribution by income in Japan, 1989 and 1998. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[21]  J. Brazier,et al.  The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health From the SF-12 , 2004, Medical care.

[22]  C. Gaziano,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Within-Household Respondent Selection Techniques , 2005 .

[23]  D. Feeny,et al.  Self-Reported Health Status of the General Adult U.S. Population as Assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index , 2005, Medical care.

[24]  Stephen Joel Coons,et al.  US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.

[25]  Vahram Ghushchyan,et al.  A National Catalog of Preference-Based Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States , 2005, Medical care.

[26]  S. Blumberg,et al.  Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[27]  O. Mitchell,et al.  Cross-Cohort Differences in Health on the Verge of Retirement , 2006 .

[28]  D. Fryback,et al.  Report of Nationally Representative Values for the Noninstitutionalized US Adult Population for 7 Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[29]  National Health Preference Data: A Useful Resource for Health Services Research , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[30]  Steffie Woolhandler,et al.  Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[31]  Patrick W. Sullivan,et al.  Preference-Based EQ-5D Index Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[32]  Janel Hanmer,et al.  Mode of Administration Is Important in US National Estimates of Health-Related Quality of Life , 2007, Medical care.

[33]  R. Holloway,et al.  The Implications of Using US-Specific EQ-5D Preference Weights for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.