Exploring the expanding Universe and dark energy using the statefinder diagnostic

The coming few years are likely to witness a dramatic increase in high-quality supernova data as current surveys add more high-redshift supernovae to their inventory and as newer and deeper supernova experiments become operational. Given the current variety in dark energy models and the expected improvement in observational data, an accurate and versatile diagnostic of dark energy is the need of the hour. This paper examines the statefinder diagnostic in the light of the proposed SuperNova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) satellite, which is expected to observe about 2000 supernovae per year. We show that the statefinder is versatile enough to differentiate between dark energy models as varied as the cosmological constant on one hand, and quintessence, the Chaplygin gas and braneworld models, on the other. Using SNAP data, the statefinder can distinguish a cosmological constant (w = -1) from quintessence models with w ≥ -0.9 and Chaplygin gas models with κ ≤ 15 at the 3a level if the value of Ω m is known exactly. The statefinder gives reasonable results even when the value of Ω m is known to only ∼20 per cent accuracy. In this case, marginalizing over Ω m and assuming a fiducial A-cold dark matter (LCDM) model allows us to rule out quintessence with w ≥ -0.85 and the Chaplygin gas with κ ≤ 7 (both at 3σ). These constraints can be made even tighter if we use the statefinders in conjunction with the deceleration parameter. The statefinder is very sensitive to the total pressure exerted by all forms of matter and radiation in the Universe. It can therefore differentiate between dark energy models at moderately high redshifts of z ≤ 10.

[1]  O. Dor'e,et al.  Are Chaplygin gases serious contenders for the dark energy , 2003, astro-ph/0301308.

[2]  A. Dev,et al.  High - redshift objects and the generalized Chaplygin gas , 2002, astro-ph/0210476.

[3]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Cosmological constraints from archeops , 2002, astro-ph/0210306.

[4]  V. Gorini,et al.  CAN THE CHAPLYGIN GAS BE A PLAUSIBLE MODEL FOR DARK ENERGY , 2002, astro-ph/0209395.

[5]  París,et al.  Alternatives to Quintessence Model Building , 2002, astro-ph/0208528.

[6]  E. Linder Exploring the expansion history of the universe. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[7]  Eric V. Linder,et al.  Importance of supernovae at z > 1.5 to probe dark energy , 2002, astro-ph/0208138.

[8]  D. Huterer,et al.  Parametrization of dark-energy properties: a principal-component approach. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  P. Peebles,et al.  The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy , 2002, astro-ph/0207347.

[10]  E. Copeland,et al.  Model independent approach to the dark energy equation of state , 2002, astro-ph/0205544.

[11]  A. Starobinsky,et al.  Statefinder—A new geometrical diagnostic of dark energy , 2002, astro-ph/0201498.

[12]  N. Benı́tez,et al.  The Magnification of SN 1997ff, the Farthest Known Supernova , 2002, astro-ph/0207097.

[13]  R. Ellis,et al.  Parameter constraints for flat cosmologies from cosmic microwave background and 2dFGRS power spectra , 2002, astro-ph/0206256.

[14]  T. Damour,et al.  Nonlinear bigravity and cosmic acceleration , 2002, hep-th/0206044.

[15]  A. Starobinsky,et al.  Prospects and problems of tachyon matter cosmology , 2002, hep-th/0204187.

[16]  O. Bertolami,et al.  Generalized Chaplygin Gas, Accelerated Expansion and Dark Energy-Matter Unification , 2002, gr-qc/0202064.

[17]  V. Sahni The cosmological constant problem and quintessence , 2002, astro-ph/0202076.

[18]  U. Cambridge,et al.  Probing quintessence: reconstruction and parameter estimation from supernovae , 2002, astro-ph/0201336.

[19]  P. Astier,et al.  Supernovae, CMB, and gravitational leakage into extra dimensions , 2002, astro-ph/0201164.

[20]  P. Steinhardt,et al.  Measuring the equation of state of the universe: Pitfalls and prospects , 2001, astro-ph/0112526.

[21]  Zagreb,et al.  Unification of dark matter and dark energy: The Inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas , 2001, astro-ph/0111325.

[22]  J. Weller,et al.  Future supernovae observations as a probe of dark energy , 2001, astro-ph/0106079.

[23]  C. Deffayet,et al.  Accelerated universe from gravity leaking to extra dimensions , 2001, astro-ph/0105068.

[24]  J. Fabris,et al.  Letter: Density Perturbations in a Universe Dominated by the Chaplygin Gas , 2001, gr-qc/0103083.

[25]  M. Tegmark Measuring the metric: A parametrized post-Friedmannian approach to the cosmic dark energy problem , 2001, astro-ph/0101354.

[26]  Rodger I. Thompson,et al.  The Farthest Known Supernova: Support for an Accelerating Universe and a Glimpse of the Epoch of Deceleration , 2001, astro-ph/0104455.

[27]  V. Pasquier,et al.  An Alternative to quintessence , 2001, gr-qc/0103004.

[28]  T. Chiba,et al.  Feasibility of reconstructing the quintessential potential using SNIa data , 2001 .

[29]  M. Porrati,et al.  4D Gravity on a Brane in 5D Minkowski Space , 2000, hep-th/0005016.

[30]  P. Steinhardt,et al.  Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late-time cosmic acceleration , 2000, Physical review letters.

[31]  T. Matos,et al.  New cosmological tracker solution for quintessence , 2000, astro-ph/0003364.

[32]  A. Starobinsky,et al.  Reconstruction of a scalar-tensor theory of gravity in an accelerating universe , 2000, Physical review letters.

[33]  A. Starobinsky,et al.  Reconstructing the cosmic equation of state from supernova distances. , 1999, Physical review letters.

[34]  A. Raval,et al.  Nonperturbative effects of vacuum energy on the recent expansion of the universe , 1999, gr-qc/9905031.

[35]  D. Spergel,et al.  Is the Dark Matter a Solid , 1998, astro-ph/9812022.

[36]  D. Huterer,et al.  Prospects for probing the dark energy via supernova distance measurements , 1998, astro-ph/9808133.

[37]  I. Hook,et al.  Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae , 1998, astro-ph/9812133.

[38]  T. Chiba,et al.  Determining the equation of state of the expanding Universe: inverse problem in cosmology , 1998, astro-ph/9810447.

[39]  A. Starobinsky,et al.  How to determine an effective potential for a variable cosmological term , 1998, astro-ph/9810431.

[40]  S. Habib,et al.  Does Inflationary Particle Production Suggest Ω m 1 , 1998, hep-ph/9808204.

[41]  A. Riess,et al.  Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant , 1998, astro-ph/9805201.

[42]  P. Steinhardt,et al.  Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state , 1997, astro-ph/9708069.

[43]  Hill,et al.  Cosmology with ultralight pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[44]  P. Peebles,et al.  Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field. , 1988, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[45]  P. Peebles,et al.  Cosmology with a Time Variable Cosmological Constant , 1988 .