Does Iterative Reconstruction Lower CT Radiation Dose: Evaluation of 15,000 Examinations

Purpose Evaluation of 15,000 computed tomography (CT) examinations to investigate if iterative reconstruction (IR) reduces sustainably radiation exposure. Method and Materials Information from 15,000 CT examinations was collected, including all aspects of the exams such as scan parameter, patient information, and reconstruction instructions. The examinations were acquired between January 2010 and December 2012, while after 15 months a first generation IR algorithm was installed. To collect the necessary information from PACS, RIS, MPPS and structured reports a Dose Monitoring System was developed. To harvest all possible information an optical character recognition system was integrated, for example to collect information from the screenshot CT-dose report. The tool transfers all data to a database for further processing such as the calculation of effective dose and organ doses. To evaluate if IR provides a sustainable dose reduction, the effective dose values were statistically analyzed with respect to protocol type, diagnostic indication, and patient population. Results IR has the potential to reduce radiation dose significantly. Before clinical introduction of IR the average effective dose was 10.1±7.8mSv and with IR 8.9±7.1mSv (p*=0.01). Especially in CTA, with the possibility to use kV reduction protocols, such as in aortic CTAs (before IR: average14.2±7.8mSv; median11.4mSv /with IR:average9.9±7.4mSv; median7.4mSv), or pulmonary CTAs (before IR: average9.7±6.2mSV; median7.7mSv /with IR: average6.4±4.7mSv; median4.8mSv) the dose reduction effect is significant(p*=0.01). On the contrary for unenhanced low-dose scans of the cranial (for example sinuses) the reduction is not significant (before IR:average6.6±5.8mSv; median3.9mSv/with IR:average6.0±3.1mSV; median3.2mSv). Conclusion The dose aspect remains a priority in CT research. Iterative reconstruction algorithms reduce sustainably and significantly radiation dose in the clinical routine. Our results illustrate that not only in studies with a limited number of patients but also in the clinical routine, IRs provide long-term dose saving.

[1]  Katsuyuki Taguchi,et al.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[2]  O. Linton,et al.  NCRP REPORT NO. 160, IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE OF THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES, MEDICAL EXPOSURE—ARE WE DOING LESS WITH MORE, AND IS THERE A ROLE FOR HEALTH PHYSICISTS? , 2009, Health physics.

[3]  D. Broga,et al.  Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States , 2009 .

[4]  R. Raupach.  SAFIRE: Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction , 2012 .

[5]  伊藤俊英,et al.  SAFIRE : sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction , 2011 .

[6]  Jacques Felblinger,et al.  CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT , 2012, European Radiology.

[7]  Ernst J Rummeny,et al.  Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[9]  Bettina M. Gramer,et al.  Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model , 2012, European Radiology.

[10]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  Temporal resolution improvement using PICCS in MDCT cardiac imaging. , 2009, Medical physics.

[11]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 1.a: CT Protocol Management and Review Practice Guideline , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[13]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[14]  Hoen-oh Shin,et al.  Influence of Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction of CT Data on Image Noise Characteristics and Low-Contrast Detectability: An Objective Approach , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[17]  R. Irwan.  AIDR 3 D-Reduces Dose and Simultaneously Improves Image Quality , 2011 .

[18]  C D Claussen,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction in Head CT: Image Quality of Routine and Low-Dose Protocols in Comparison with Standard Filtered Back-Projection , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[19]  James K Min,et al.  Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.