The SF-36 is a practical and widely-tested instrument for measuring health status and medical outcomes. This article is not a critique of the SF-36, rather, it underscores its viability as an instrument for measuring physical and mental health and well-being. The article is a conceptual analysis of the SF-36, from the viewpoint of four models of health: medical, World Health Organization, wellness, and environmental All four models suggest that the SF-36 be expanded to include other dimensions of health, especially mental and social. Specific dimensions to be included are: incidents of morbidity, satisfaction with quality of life, absence of mental disorders, social adjustment, social support, higher states offunctioning, and adjustment to the environment. The end result of the suggested additions would be an instrument with greater conceptual meaning, for use in medical outcomes studies or surveys of the general population.
[1]
M. Weissman,et al.
Clinical evaluation of hostility in depression.
,
1971,
The American journal of psychiatry.
[2]
S. Goldsmith.
The status of health status indicators.
,
1972,
Health services reports.
[3]
M. Bergner,et al.
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure
,
1981,
Medical care.
[4]
THE MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH IN URBAN COMMUNITIES
,
1986
.
[5]
Content validity in the assessment of health status.
,
1986
.
[6]
Planning for community health promotion: a rural example.
,
1988
.
[7]
C. Sherbourne,et al.
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
,
1992
.
[8]
J. Larson.
The measurement of social well-being
,
1993
.