The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma

Abstract While Six Sigma is increasingly implemented in industry, little academic research has been done on Six Sigma and its influence on quality management theory and application. There is a criticism that Six Sigma simply puts traditional quality management practices in a new package. To investigate this issue and the role of Six Sigma in quality management, this study reviewed both the traditional quality management and Six Sigma literatures and identified three new practices that are critical for implementing Six Sigma's concept and method in an organization. These practices are referred to as: Six Sigma role structure, Six Sigma structured improvement procedure, and Six Sigma focus on metrics. A research model and survey instrument were developed to investigate how these Six Sigma practices integrate with seven traditional quality management practices to affect quality performance and business performance. Test results based on a sample of 226 US manufacturing plants revealed that the three Six Sigma practices are distinct practices from traditional quality management practices, and that they complement the traditional quality management practices in improving performance. The implications of the findings for researchers and practitioners are discussed and further research directions are offered.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organization Theory and Design , 1983 .

[2]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach , 2006 .

[3]  Roberto Filippini,et al.  TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model , 1998 .

[4]  Jean-François Henri ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[5]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[6]  Peter C. Brewer Six Sigma helps a company create a culture of accountability , 2004 .

[7]  Michael L. George,et al.  Lean Six Sigma for Service : How to Use Lean Speed and Six Sigma Quality to Improve Services and Transactions , 2003 .

[8]  Kun-Chang Lee,et al.  Six sigma management activities and their influence on corporate competitiveness , 2006 .

[9]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Evolution of Quality: First Fifty Issues of Production and Operations Management , 2005 .

[10]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory , 2008 .

[11]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[12]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Culture on Time-Based Manufacturing and Performance , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[13]  J. Barney,et al.  On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage , 1998 .

[14]  S. Ahire,et al.  The role of top management commitment in quality management: an empirical analysis of the auto parts industry , 1998 .

[15]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[16]  Becki Meadows,et al.  Managing six sigma : a practical guide to understanding, assessing, and implementing the strategy that yields bottom-line success , 2001 .

[17]  L. Crocker,et al.  Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory , 1986 .

[18]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Conceptualizing continuous improvement: Implications for organizational change , 1995 .

[19]  T. C. Powell Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[20]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[21]  I. Sila,et al.  Critical linkages among TQM factors and business results , 2005 .

[22]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[23]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams , 2006 .

[24]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction? , 2004 .

[25]  Sean P. Goffnett Understanding Six Sigma®: Implications for Industry and Education , 2004 .

[26]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[27]  S. Ahire,et al.  The impact of design management and process management on quality: an empirical investigation , 2000 .

[28]  Robert Slater The GE Way Fieldbook: Jack Welch's Battle Plan for Corporate Revolution , 1999 .

[29]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[30]  Kevin W. Linderman,et al.  Method and Psychological Effects on Learning Behaviors and Knowledge Creation in Quality Improvement Projects , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User’s Guide , 2002 .

[32]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[33]  Peter S. Pande,et al.  The Six Sigma way , 2007 .

[34]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The TQM Paradox: Relations among TQM practices, plant performance, and customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[35]  A. Sohal,et al.  The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination , 2003 .

[36]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Designing Work Within and Between Organizations , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Jayant V. Saraph,et al.  An Instrument for Measuring the Critical Factors of Quality Management , 1989 .

[38]  Michael Beer,et al.  Why Total Quality Management Programs Do Not Persist: The Role of Management Quality and Implications for Leading a TQM Transformation , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[39]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[40]  Kai Yang,et al.  Design for Six Sigma , 2005 .

[41]  James R. Evans,et al.  Successful implementation of Six Sigma: benchmarking General Electric Company , 2000 .

[42]  Chu‐Hua Kuei,et al.  Leading Six Sigma – A Step‐by‐Step Guide Based on Experience with GE and Other Six Sigma Companies , 2004 .

[43]  Charles R. Gowen,et al.  Effect of technological intensity on the relationships among Six Sigma design, electronic-business, and competitive advantage: A dynamic capabilities model study , 2005 .

[44]  Anand Nair,et al.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance -- Implications for quality management theory development , 2006 .

[45]  David J. Lemak,et al.  Beyond Process: TQM Content and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[46]  Peter S. Pande,et al.  The Six Sigma Way Team Fieldbook: An Implementation Guide for Process Improvement Teams , 2001 .

[47]  Sanjay L. Ahire,et al.  Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs , 1996 .

[48]  M. Terziovski,et al.  The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance , 1999 .

[49]  T. Douglas,et al.  Total Quality Management Implementation and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Structural Control and Exploration , 2001 .

[50]  John C. Anderson,et al.  A Path Analytic Model of a Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method: Preliminary Empirical Findings* , 1995 .

[51]  Matt Barney Motorola's Second Generation , 2002 .

[52]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Total quality management: practice and outcomes in the largest US firms , 1995 .

[53]  Don R. Holcomb Design for Six Sigma in Technology and Product Development , 2003 .

[54]  Hale Kaynak,et al.  Using replication research for just-in-time purchasing construct development , 2006 .

[55]  T. Ward,et al.  Measuring Banks' Automated Service Quality: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach , 2005 .

[56]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management , 2007 .

[57]  Donald R. Bacon,et al.  Composite Reliability in Structural Equations Modeling , 1995 .

[58]  Hale Kaynak,et al.  The relationship between total quality management: practices and their effects on firm performance , 2003 .

[59]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[60]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program , 2002 .

[61]  Peter S. Pande,et al.  The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance , 2000 .

[62]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective , 2003 .

[63]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  An Empirical Model for Managing Quality in the Electronics Industry , 2005 .

[64]  L. Hayduk Structural equation modeling with LISREL , 1987 .

[65]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[66]  Tirthankar Dasgupta,et al.  Using the six-sigma metric to measure and improve the performance of a supply chain , 2003 .

[67]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .

[68]  R. Handfield,et al.  Quality-Driven Change and its Effects on Financial Performance , 1998 .

[69]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  Keki R. Bhote The power of ultimate Six Sigma : Keki Bhote's proven system for moving beyond quality excellence to total business excellence , 2003 .

[71]  Juan Manuel García-Falcón,et al.  A resource-based view of human resource management and organizational capabilities development , 2002 .

[72]  C. Voss,et al.  Quality management re-visited: a reflective review and agenda for future research , 2002 .

[73]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[74]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[75]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  SOCIAL AND METHOD EFFECTS ON LEARNING BEHAVIORS AND KNOWLEDGE CREATION IN SIX SIGMA PROJECTS. , 2004 .

[76]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Some pros and cons of six sigma: an academic perspective , 2004 .