Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning

Background: Image quality and radiation dose to the patient are important factors in computed tomography (CT). To provide constant image quality, tube current modulation (TCM) performed by automatic exposure control (AEC) adjusts the tube current to the patient's size and shape. Purpose: To evaluate the effects of patient centering on tube current–time product (mAs) and image noise. Material and Methods: An oval-shaped acrylic phantom was scanned in various off-center positions, at 30-mm intervals within a 500-mm field of view, using three different CT scanners. Acquisition parameters were similar to routine abdomen examinations at each site. The mAs was recorded and noise measured in the images. The correlation of mAs and noise with position was calculated using Pearson correlation. Results: In all three scanners, the mAs delivered by the AEC changed with y-position of the phantom (P<0.001), with correlation values of 0.98 for scanners A and B and −0.98 for scanner C. With x-position, mAs changes were 4.9% or less. As the phantom moved into the y-positions, compared with the iso-center, the mAs varied by up to +70%, −34%, and +56% in scanners A, B, and C, respectively. For scanners A and B, noise in two regions of interest in the lower part of the phantom decreased with elevation, with correlation factors from −0.95 to −0.86 (P<0.02). In the x-direction, significant noise relationships (P<0.005) were only seen in scanner A. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patient centering markedly affects the efficacy of AEC function and that tube current changes vary between scanners. Tube position when acquiring the scout projection radiograph is decisive for the direction of the mAs change. Off-center patient positions cause errors in tube current modulation that can outweigh the dose reduction gained by AEC use, and image quality is affected.

[1]  R. Brooks,et al.  Statistical limitations in x-ray reconstructive tomography. , 1976, Medical physics.

[2]  Holger Greess,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers , 1999, European Radiology.

[3]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Computed tomography : fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications , 2000 .

[4]  E. Nickoloff,et al.  Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. , 2004, Radiology.

[7]  J. Remy,et al.  Multi-detector row spiral CT angiography of the thoracic outlet: dose reduction with anatomically adapted online tube current modulation and preset dose savings. , 2004, Radiology.

[8]  T. Mulkens,et al.  Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. , 2005, Radiology.

[10]  Nicholas Keat,et al.  CT scanner automatic exposure control systems , 2005 .

[11]  Mannudeep K Kalra,et al.  Computed tomography radiation dose optimization: scanning protocols and clinical applications of automatic exposure control. , 2005, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[12]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  J. Valentin,et al.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  Thomas Toth,et al.  The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise. , 2007, Medical physics.

[16]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Angular on-line tube current modulation in multidetector CT examinations of children and adults: the influence of different scanning parameters on dose reduction. , 2007, Medical physics.

[18]  Adrian K. Dixon,et al.  Benefits and costs, an eternal balance , 2007 .