Magnetic coil suppression of extrafoveal visual perception using disappearance targets.

We used magnetic brain stimulation with a butterfly coil over the occipital lobes to study extrafoveal visual field effects in six subjects. The visual test pattern was a grid of asterisks around a central fixation point, and the target was the disappearance of one asterisk for a single frame of the video monitor. Using single magnetic pulses at stimulator outputs of 55-95%, we noted robust interference effects at latencies < or = 100 ms, peaking at approximately 50-90 ms. Suppression of visual perception occurred with both transverse and sagittal alignments of the coil. When the coil was moved laterally over either occipital lobe, perception of target disappearance was consistently suppressed in the contralateral visual field. Movement of the coil rostrally produced consistent suppression in the lower and middle field, but preferential suppression of the upper field could not be obtained. This altitudinal asymmetry may be correlated with the anatomy of the occipital lobe in relation to the scalp surface.

[1]  I. Yaar.  EEG power spectral changes secondary to L-DOPA treatment in parkinsonian patients: a pilot study. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  C. Epstein.  Magnetic mapping of human cervical nerve roots: variation in normal subjects. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  P S Tofts,et al.  The distribution of induced currents in magnetic stimulation of the nervous system. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  E Marg,et al.  Phosphenes Induced by Magnetic Stimulation Over the Occipital Brain: Description and Probable Site of Stimulation , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  H. Masur,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation--experimental findings in healthy subjects and patients with optic neuritis. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  J C Rothwell,et al.  The polarity of the induced electric field influences magnetic coil inhibition of human visual cortex: implications for the site of excitation. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  V. Amassian,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  M Hallett,et al.  A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced in the cortex during magnetic stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  E Marg,et al.  Finding the depth of magnetic brain stimulation: a re-evaluation. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  V. Amassian,et al.  Brain stimulation revisited. , 1990, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[11]  Alan P. Rudell,et al.  Unmasking human visual perception with the magnetic coil and its relationship to hemispheric asymmetry , 1993, Brain Research.

[12]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[13]  Charles M. Epstein,et al.  Localizing the site of magnetic brain stimulation in humans , 1990, Neurology.

[14]  B N Cuffin,et al.  Developing a more focal magnetic stimulator. Part I: Some basic principles. , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.