Towards a Maturity Model for E-Collaboration - A Design Science Research Approach

Introducing electronic collaboration (e-collaboration) is not a matter of introducing new software, but it is a matter of introducing new, and if applied correctly, more efficient working processes and methods (i.e., e-collaboration capability). As a first step before introducing a collaboration technology, managers should comprehensively examine their organization's underlying capability. Accordingly, this study draws on literature of maturity models and success factors in the areas of e-collaboration and knowledge management as well as results of case studies of SharePoint introduction projects in order to propose a maturity model for e-collaboration as holistic approach which seeks to detect whether an organization exhibits the capabilities for efficient e-collaboration (i.e., analyze as-is situation) or what should be altered or implemented in order to achieve this (i.e., derive measures). Hence, this paper presents the first iteration of an e-collaboration maturity model instantiated as Excel assessment by using the design science research methodology and it results with the proposition of a situational alignment.

[1]  Niall Cook Enterprise 2.0 : How Social Software Will Change the Future of Work , 2008 .

[2]  Robert Winter,et al.  Method Versus Model - Two Sides of the Same Coin? , 2009, CIAO! / EOMAS.

[3]  Tobias Bucher,et al.  Situational Method Engineering - On the Differentiation of "Context" and "Project Type" , 2007 .

[4]  Geoffrey Bock,et al.  Groupware - software for computer-supported cooperative work , 1992 .

[5]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[6]  Brenda Huettner,et al.  Managing Virtual Teams: Getting The Most From Wikis, Blogs, And Other Collaborative Tools , 2006 .

[7]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[8]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[9]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems , 2010 .

[10]  Elisa Mattarelli,et al.  Use of collaborative technologies and knowledge sharing in co-located and distributed teams: Towards the 24-h knowledge factory , 2009, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model , 2005 .

[12]  Colette Rolland,et al.  Towards a Generic Model for Situational Method Engineering , 2003, CAiSE.

[13]  Daniel Stoller-Schai E-Collaboration: Die Gestaltung internetgestützter kollaborativer Handlungsfelder , 2003 .

[14]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Developing Maturity Models for IT Management , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[15]  Tobias Mettler,et al.  A Design Science Research Perspective on Maturity Models in Information Systems , 2009 .

[16]  Mike Gregory,et al.  The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability , 2002, IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[17]  Thomas A. Gutzwiller,et al.  Das CC RIM-Referenzmodell für den Entwurf von betrieblichen, transaktionsorientierten Informationssystemen , 1994 .

[18]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[19]  Robert Winter,et al.  Situational Method Engineering , 2007, Situational Method Engineering.

[20]  Tobias Mettler,et al.  Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design , 2009, DESRIST.

[21]  Isabelle Mirbel,et al.  Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[22]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Konstruktion von Referenzmodellierungssprachen Ein Ordnungsrahmen zur Spezifikation von Adaptionsmechanismen für Informationsmodelle , 2004, Wirtschaftsinf..