Dasymetric Mapping and Areal Interpolation: Implementation and Evaluation

Dasymetric maps display statistical data in meaningful spatial zones. Such maps can be preferable to choropleth maps that show data by enumeration zones, because dasymetric zones more accurately represent underlying data distributions. Though dasymetric mapping has existed for well over a century, the methods for producing these maps have not been thoroughly examined. In contrast, research on areal interpolation has been more thorough and has examined methods of transferring data from one set of map zones to another, an issue that is applicable to dasymetric mapping. Inspired by this work, we tested five dasymetric mapping methods, including methods derived from work on areal interpolation. Dasymetric maps of six socio-economic variables were produced fm a study area of 159 counties in the eastern U.S. using county choropleth data and ancillary land-use data. Both polygonal (vector) and grid (raster) dasymetric methods were tested. We evaluated map accuracy using both statistical analyses and visual presentations of error. A repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that the traditional limiting variable method had significantly lower error than the other four methods. In addition, polygon methods had lower error than their grid-based counterparts, though the difference was not statistically significant. Error maps largely supported the conclusions from the statistical analysis, while also presenting patterns of error that were not obvious from the statistics.

[1]  Harold M. Mayer,et al.  National Atlas of the United States. , 1958 .

[2]  F. J. Marschner,et al.  Major land uses in the United States , 1967 .

[3]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Areal interpolation: A variant of the traditional spatial problem , 1980 .

[4]  Flat Laxity, Optimization, And Rounding In The Selection Of Class Intervals , 1982 .

[5]  M. Monmonier,et al.  Land use and land cover data and the mapping of population density. , 1984 .

[6]  Robin Flowerdew,et al.  Data integration: Statistical methods for transferring data between zonal systems , 1991 .

[7]  Robin Flowerdew,et al.  Developments in Areal Interpolation Methods and GIS , 1992 .

[8]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  A Framework for the Areal Interpolation of Socioeconomic Data , 1993 .

[9]  Andrew Moxey,et al.  Areal Interpolation of Spatially Extensive Variables: A Comparison of Alternative Techniques , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  M. Langford,et al.  Generating and mapping population density surfaces within a geographical information system. , 1994, The Cartographic journal.

[11]  Mark W. Green,et al.  Areal interpolation and types of data , 1994 .

[12]  David M. Mark,et al.  The University Consortium for Geographic Information Science , 1995 .

[13]  National water summary 1990-91: Hydrologic events and stream water quality. Annual report , 1995 .

[14]  Jeffrey C. Patton,et al.  SOME Truth with Maps: A Primer on Symbolization and Design , 1995 .

[15]  Robert G. Cromley,et al.  A Comparison of Optimal Classification Strategies for Choroplethic Displays of Spatially Aggregated Data , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Modeling Sensitivity to Accuracy in Classified Imagery: A Study of Areal Interpolation by Dasymetric Mapping* , 1996 .

[17]  Lynette Bloom,et al.  Implementation of enhanced areal interpolation using MapInfo , 1996 .

[18]  Michael N. DeMers,et al.  Fundamentals of Geographic Information Systems , 1996 .

[19]  Eric S. Fowler,et al.  Exploring Geographic Information Systems , 1997 .

[20]  Nicholas Chrisman,et al.  Rethinking Levels of Measurement for Cartography , 1998 .

[21]  Terry A. Slocum Thematic Cartography and Visualization , 1998 .