The effect of protein relaxation on charge-charge interactions and dielectric constants of proteins.

The effect of the reorganization of the protein polar groups on charge-charge interaction and the corresponding effective dielectric constant (epsilon(eff)) is examined by the semimicroscopic version of the Protein Dipole Langevin Dipoles (PDLD/S) method within the framework of the Linear Response Approximation (LRA). This is done by evaluating the interactions between ionized residues in the reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, while taking into account the protein reorganization energy. It is found that an explicit consideration of the protein relaxation leads to a significant increase in epsilon(eff) and that semimicroscopic models that do not take this relaxation into account force one to use a large value for the so-called "protein dielectric constant," epsilon(p), of the Poisson-Boltzmann model or for the corresponding epsilon(in) in the PDLD/S model. An additional increase in epsilon(eff) is expected from the reorganization of ionized residues and from changes in the degree of water penetration. This finding provides further support for the idea that epsilon(in) (or epsilon(p)) represents contributions that are not considered explicitly. The present study also provides a systematic illustration of the nature of epsilon(eff), supporting our previously reported view that charge-charge interactions correspond to a large value of this "dielectric constant," even in protein interiors. It is also pointed out that epsilon(eff) for the interaction between ionizable groups in proteins is very different from the effective dielectric constant, epsilon'(eff), that determines the free energy of ion pairs in proteins (epsilon'(eff) reflects the effect of preoriented protein dipoles). Finally, the problems associated with the search for a general epsilon(in) are discussed. It is clarified that the epsilon(in) that reproduces the effect of protein relaxation on charge-charge interaction is not equal to the epsilon(in) that reproduces the corresponding effect upon formation of individual charges. This reflects fundamental inconsistencies in attempts to cast microscopic concepts in a macroscopic model. Thus one should either use a large epsilon(in) for charge-charge interactions and a small epsilon(in) for charge-dipole interactions or consider the protein relaxation microscopically.

[1]  Rebecca C. Wade,et al.  Improving the Continuum Dielectric Approach to Calculating pKas of Ionizable Groups in Proteins , 1996 .

[2]  A. Warshel,et al.  Calculations of antibody-antigen interactions: microscopic and semi-microscopic evaluation of the free energies of binding of phosphorylcholine analogs to McPC603. , 1992, Protein engineering.

[3]  G. Fritzsch,et al.  Structure of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodobacter sphaeroides at 2.65 A resolution: cofactors and protein-cofactor interactions. , 1994, Structure.

[4]  D. Rees Experimental evaluation of the effective dielectric constant of proteins. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  A. Warshel,et al.  Electrostatic control of GTP and GDP binding in the oncoprotein p21ras. , 1996, Structure.

[6]  J. Warwicker,et al.  Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to alpha-helix dipoles. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  M. Perutz Electrostatic effects in proteins. , 1978, Science.

[8]  Bo Svensson,et al.  An efficient simulation technique for electrostatic free energies with applications to azurin , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  K. Sharp,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. , 1990, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[10]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  A local reaction field method for fast evaluation of long‐range electrostatic interactions in molecular simulations , 1992 .

[11]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Consistent Calculations of pKa's of Ionizable Residues in Proteins: Semi-microscopic and Microscopic Approaches , 1997 .

[12]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  A surface constrained all‐atom solvent model for effective simulations of polar solutions , 1989 .

[13]  E. Mehler Self-Consistent, Free Energy Based Approximation To Calculate pH Dependent Electrostatic Effects in Proteins , 1996 .

[14]  A. Warshel,et al.  Why ion pair reversal by protein engineering is unlikely to succeed , 1988, Nature.

[15]  K. Sharp,et al.  On the calculation of pKas in proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[16]  A. Warshel,et al.  Microscopic and semimacroscopic redox calculations: what can and cannot be learned from continuum models , 1997, JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry.

[17]  F Sherman,et al.  Effect of the Asn52----Ile mutation on the redox potential of yeast cytochrome c. Theory and experiment. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  A. W. Warshel [42] Correlation between the structure and efficiency of light-induced proton pumps , 1986 .

[19]  A. Warshel,et al.  Macroscopic models for studies of electrostatic interactions in proteins: limitations and applicability. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Warshel,et al.  Energetics of enzyme catalysis. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  P. Beroza,et al.  Electrostatic calculations of amino acid titration and electron transfer, Q-AQB-->QAQ-B, in the reaction center. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[22]  A. Warshel,et al.  CONVERSION OF LIGHT ENERGY TO ELECTROSTATIC ENERGY IN THE PROTON PUMP OF HALOBACTERIUM HALOBIUM , 1979, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[23]  H. Nakamura,et al.  Roles of electrostatic interaction in proteins , 1996, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[24]  S. Creighton,et al.  Role of arginine-38 in regulation of the cytochrome c oxidation-reduction equilibrium. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[25]  A. Warshel Electrostatic basis of structure-function correlation in proteins , 1981 .

[26]  J. B. Matthew Electrostatic effects in proteins. , 1985, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[27]  A. Warshel,et al.  A fast estimate of electrostatic group contributions to the free energy of protein-inhibitor binding. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[28]  A. Warshel,et al.  Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions , 1984, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[29]  M. Levitt,et al.  Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Microscopic Dielectric Properties of Cytochrome c from Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Aqueous Solution , 1995 .

[31]  R. G. Alden,et al.  Calculations of Electrostatic Energies in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers , 1995 .

[32]  A. Warshel,et al.  Calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins. The energetics of ionized groups in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  A. Warshel Calculations of enzymatic reactions: calculations of pKa, proton transfer reactions, and general acid catalysis reactions in enzymes. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[34]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Microscopic simulations of macroscopic dielectric constants of solvated proteins , 1991 .

[35]  A. Warshel,et al.  Electrostatic energy and macromolecular function. , 1991, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[36]  R. Levy,et al.  Intrinsic pKas of ionizable residues in proteins: An explicit solvent calculation for lysozyme , 1994, Proteins.

[37]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Microscopic and semimicroscopic calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins by the POLARIS and ENZYMIX programs , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  B. Honig,et al.  Calculated coupling of electron and proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[39]  M K Gilson,et al.  Theory of electrostatic interactions in macromolecules. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.