Sustainability-oriented efficiency of retail supply chains: A combination of Life Cycle Assessment and dynamic network Data Envelopment Analysis.

Assessing the efficiency of retail supply chains (RSCs) requires analytical tools that address the different activities involved in these chains. In this sense, dynamic network Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) arises as a suitable method to evaluate the operational performance of RSCs over a period of time. However, its use for sustainability-oriented efficiency assessment constitutes a knowledge gap that limits its applicability for thorough decision-making processes, e.g. at the retail company level. This article fills this gap through the combination of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and dynamic network DEA. A novel five-step LCA + DEA approach is proposed and applied to a case study of 30 RSCs in Spain for the period 2015-2017. In this case, the supply chain structure involves three divisions: central distribution, operation of retail stores, and home delivery. Both overall- and term-efficiency scores were found to widely range from 0.38 to 1.00, with only 1 RSC deemed efficient. Regarding divisional efficiency, store operation was found to generally show significantly higher efficiency scores than the distribution divisions. The link between long distribution distances and low efficiency stresses the relevance of integrating a network perspective into the efficiency assessment. In addition to efficiency scores, the LCA + DEA approach enriches the assessment by providing environmental, operational and socio-economic benchmarks to further support the management of RSCs from a sustainability perspective.

[1]  Ali H. Diabat,et al.  A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences , 2013 .

[2]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  An empirical analysis of productivity growth in a Portuguese retail chain using Malmquist productivity index , 2004 .

[3]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  An illustration of dynamic network DEA in commercial banking including robustness tests , 2015 .

[4]  Pezhman Ghadimi,et al.  Sustainable supply chain modeling and analysis: Past debate, present problems and future challenges , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[5]  Maria Teresa Moreira,et al.  Combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis as a methodological approach for the assessment of fisheries , 2010 .

[6]  Mario Martín-Gamboa,et al.  A review of life-cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis within multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability assessment of energy systems , 2017 .

[7]  D. Iribarren,et al.  Harmonising the cumulative energy demand of renewable hydrogen for robust comparative life-cycle studies , 2018 .

[8]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of major container shipping companies: A framework of dynamic network DEA with shared inputs , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[9]  Sebastian Seebauer,et al.  Carbon emissions of retail channels: the limits of available policy instruments to achieve absolute reductions , 2016 .

[10]  D. Iribarren,et al.  Combined use of Data Envelopment Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for operational and environmental benchmarking in the service sector: A case study of grocery stores. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach , 2013 .

[12]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[13]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  Hypermarket retail store efficiency in Portugal , 2003 .

[14]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Assessing sustainability of supply chains: An inverse network dynamic DEA model , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Anand Sivasubramaniam,et al.  Energy disaggregation analysis of a supermarket chain using a facility-model , 2015 .

[16]  Ian Vázquez-Rowe,et al.  Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making , 2015, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[17]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Environmental impact efficiency in mussel cultivation , 2010 .

[19]  Jacques Leonardi,et al.  Assessing carbon footprint and energy efficiency in competing supply chains: Review - Case studies and benchmarking , 2012 .

[20]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[21]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector , 2011 .

[22]  D. Iribarren,et al.  Sustainability-oriented management of retail stores through the combination of life cycle assessment and dynamic data envelopment analysis. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Measuring Japanese bank performance: a dynamic network DEA approach , 2015 .

[24]  Hong Yan,et al.  Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  A. Hospido,et al.  Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. , 2011, Science of the Total Environment.

[26]  Xiaojun Wang,et al.  The role of Supplier Relationship Management in reducing Greenhouse Gas emissions from food supply chains: Supplier engagement in the UK supermarket sector , 2016 .

[27]  R. Mateus,et al.  Combined carbon and energy intensity benchmarks for sustainable retail stores , 2018, Energy.

[28]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Wantao Yu,et al.  An assessment of operational efficiency of retail firms in China , 2009 .

[30]  Daniel Aloise,et al.  A review of Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis: state of the art and applications , 2018, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[31]  Bin Shen,et al.  Service supply chain management: A review of operational models , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..