Computerized segmentation and diagnostics of whole-body bone scintigrams

Bone scintigraphy or whole-body bone scan is one of the most common diagnostic procedures in nuclear medicine. Since expert physicians evaluate images manually some automated procedure for pathology detection is desired. A robust knowledge based methodology for segmenting body scans into the main skeletal regions is presented. The algorithm is simultaneously applied on anterior and posterior whole-body bone scintigrams. Expert knowledge is represented as a set of parameterized rules, used to support standard image processing algorithms. The segmented bone regions are parameterized with algorithms for classifying patterns so the pathologies can be classified with machine learning algorithms. This approach enables automatic scintigraphy evaluation of pathological changes, thus in addition to detection of point-like high-uptake lesions also other types can be discovered. Our study includes 467 consecutive, non-selected scintigrams. Automatic analysis of whole-body bone scans using our segmentation algorithm gives more accurate and reliable results than previous studies. Preliminary experiments show that our expert system based on machine learning closely mimics the results of expert physicians.

[1]  A. Hendler,et al.  When to use bone scintigraphy. It can reveal things other studies cannot. , 1998, Postgraduate medicine.

[2]  Albert Bijaoui,et al.  DeQuant: a flexible multiresolution restoration framework , 2004, Signal Process..

[3]  R. Brubaker.  Models for the perception of speech and visual form: Weiant Wathen-Dunn, ed.: Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, I–X, 470 pages , 1968 .

[4]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations , 2002, SGMD.

[5]  Weiant Wathen-Dunn,et al.  Models for the perception of speech and visual form : proceedings of a symposium , 1967 .

[6]  Igor Kononenko,et al.  Analysing and improving the diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease with machine learning , 1999, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  Jiebo Luo,et al.  Multilabel machine learning and its application to semantic scene classification , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Matjaz Bevk,et al.  Towards symbolic mining of images with association rules: Preliminary results on textures , 2006, Intell. Data Anal..

[9]  K. Bohuslavizki,et al.  Bone scintigraphy in clinical routine , 2001 .

[10]  T. K. Natarajan,et al.  Validation of a rapid computerized method of measuring 99mTc pertechnetate uptake for routine assessment of thyroid structure and function. , 1973, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[11]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[12]  L. Jenicke,et al.  Artifacts and non-osseous uptake in bone scintigraphy. Imaging reports of 20 cases , 2001 .

[13]  S Noda,et al.  Percentage of the positive area of bone metastasis is an independent predictor of disease death in advanced prostate cancer , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[15]  P.V.C. Hough,et al.  Machine Analysis of Bubble Chamber Pictures , 1959 .

[16]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[17]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[18]  H Nordli,et al.  Identification of thoracic intervertebral spaces by means of surface anatomy: a magnetic resonance imaging study , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  Tang-Kai Yin,et al.  A computer-aided diagnosis for locating abnormalities in bone scintigraphy by a fuzzy system with a three-step minimization approach , 2004, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  Hiroshi Murase,et al.  Visual learning and recognition of 3-d objects from appearance , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.