A bottom-up approach to class-dependent feature selection for material classification

In this work, the merits of class-dependent image feature selection for real-world material classification is investigated. Current state-of-the-art approaches to material classification attempt to discriminate materials based on their surface properties by using a rich set of heterogeneous local features. The primary foundation of these approaches is the hypothesis that materials can be optimally discriminated using a single combination of features. Here, a method for determining the optimal subset of features for each material category separately is introduced. Furthermore, translation and scale-invariant polar grids have been designed in this work to show that, although materials are not restricted to a specific shape, there is a clear structure in the spatial allocation of local features. Experimental evaluation on a database of real-world materials indicates that indeed each material category has its own preference. The use of both the class-dependent feature selection and polar grids results in recognition rates which exceed the current state-of-the-art results.

[1]  Edmond Zhang,et al.  Enhanced Spatial Pyramid Matching Using Log-Polar-Based Image Subdivision and Representation , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications.

[2]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[3]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  A Statistical Approach to Texture Classification from Single Images , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Feng Chu,et al.  A General Wrapper Approach to Selection of Class-Dependent Features , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[5]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Material perception: What can you see in a brief glance? , 2010 .

[6]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Recognizing Materials Using Perceptually Inspired Features , 2013, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[8]  Rong Xiao,et al.  Pairwise Rotation Invariant Co-Occurrence Local Binary Pattern , 2014, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Mario Fritz,et al.  Classifying materials in the real world , 2010, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Decision Forests: A Unified Framework for Classification, Regression, Density Estimation, Manifold Learning and Semi-Supervised Learning , 2012, Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vis..

[11]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[12]  David M. Blei,et al.  Supervised Topic Models , 2007, NIPS.

[13]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Class-Specific Material Categorisation , 2005, ICCV.

[14]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Reflectance and texture of real-world surfaces , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[16]  Yingli Tian,et al.  Evaluating effectiveness of Latent Dirichlet Allocation model for scene classification , 2011, 2011 20th Annual Wireless and Optical Communications Conference (WOCC).

[17]  Xiaofeng Ren,et al.  Toward Robust Material Recognition for Everyday Objects , 2011, BMVC.

[18]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  A Statistical Approach to Material Classification Using Image Patch Exemplars , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Exploring features in a Bayesian framework for material recognition , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.